Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Monday, April 15, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Lies and their cost: With new documentary, filmmaker captures fight to hold Alex Jones accountable

In his latest documentary for HBO, which premiered in Austin this month, director Dan Reed takes viewers into the courtroom to witness Sandy Hook parents’ fight for justice against conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.

AUSTIN, Texas (CN) — Two years ago, parents of children who were killed in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, sued Austin-based anti-government conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and won. 

That’s the true-to-life synopsis of U.K. filmmaker Dan Reed’s new film “The Truth vs. Alex Jones.” Ahead of its March 26 release on HBO and Max, the documentary premiered Monday in Austin, Texas, during the annual South By Southwest film festival. Reed, who has explored the darker side of human nature in his previous documentaries, served as its writer, producer, director and cameraman.

“The Truth vs. Alex Jones” is a gripping account of the conspiracy theorist’s falsehoods, the effect they had on Sandy Hook parents and those parents’ journey to hold Jones accountable. 

Over the course of the two-hour film, viewers see the rise of Jones from amateur public-access television host in always-weird Austin, Texas, to popularizer of the idea that the shooting at Sandy Hook was a so-called false flag. Jones mocked parents whose children were sensely murdered, claiming they were actors whose children were still alive and well. 

As these claims grew in popularity, so t00 did Jones and his platform, Infowars. People who believe in Jones’s falsehoods went on to harass the parents online. They received death threats, and one parent even got a voicemail from a person who claimed he’d desecrated their child’s grave. 

As the abuse accumulated and as Jones used the lies to promote and sell vitamins and supplements on his website, the parents reached their breaking point. In 2018, Neil Heslin and Scarlett Lewis, the parents of six-year-old shooting victim Jessie Lewis, sued Jones in Austin for defamation and acting with malice to inflict mental and emotional anguish. 

More lawsuits followed, including from the family members of nine more victims and a first responder in Connecticut. A year after the lawsuits were filed, Reed reached out to the parents’ lawyers and began capturing the parents’ journey for justice. 

Reed and his crew were given exclusive access to Jones’ Texas trial after Travis County District Court Judge Maya Guerra Gamble permitted cameras and microphones in the courtroom. Having such access allowed him to portray the legal proceedings in a way that would not have been possible otherwise. 

“Court proceedings are very alienating,” Reed said in an interview with Courthouse News. “There is a language that people don't understand,” as well as “a very set way of doing things and procedures that are opaque. I wanted to make it make sense to people, and I wanted to shoot pictures where they felt like they're in the room.”

It wasn’t the first time Reed has turned his camera on humanity’s darker side. In 2019, his two-part series for HBO, “Leaving Neverland,” told the story of two men who claimed they were sexually abused as children by pop icon Michael Jackson. He’s also taken viewers into the 2013 al-Shabab mall attack in Nairobi, Kenya, and the deadly Jan. 6 Capitol riots. 

Acknowledging the theme of violence throughout his filmography, Reed said in his interview that the Sandy Hook massacre itself was not the subject of the film. Rather, it was an inciting incident that led to historic defamation trials more than ten years later.

Before Jones ever stepped foot in Austin’s downtown courtroom in the summer of 2022, judges in Texas and Connecticut had already issued default judgments against him for defaming the parents after he failed to comply with court-ordered discovery requests.

Going into trial to determine damages, Jones began claiming that he was a victim of a rigged judicial system. And yet during his deposition and trial, he acknowledged that his statements about Sandy Hook were false.

ADVERTISEMENT

Viewers of the film experience many of the viral moments in that trial, from heartbreaking testimony from parents like Heslin and Lewis to Jones’s antics in and out of court. Tense moments between Jones and Mark Bankston, an attorney with Houston-based Farrar & Ball who represented Heslin and Lewis, play out as if ripped from the script of a legal drama. 

Seeing Jones as an “absolutely brilliant showman,” Reed said he was keen to avoid the “fatal attraction” some viewers might have for his character and instead focus on the parents who were the real heart of the story. 

“You have to resist that, because media instinctively gravitate towards stuff that's showy,” Reed explained. “There are some of Jones’ antics in the documentary, but I hope that we got the right balance between portraying what actually happened in court and resisting becoming The Jones Show.”

U.K.-based filmmaker Dan Reed speaks to the audience after the premiere of his film "The Truth vs. Alex Jones" at South By Southwest on March 11, 2024. (Kirk McDaniel/Courthouse News)

Several people who lived the real-life story behind “The Truth vs. Alex Jones” were present for the film’s premiere at SXSW, including attorney Bankston, Judge Gamble and Mark Barden, whose son Daniel was killed in the shooting. 

Barden is the co-founder and CEO of Sandy Hook Promise, an education and advocacy organization focused on preventing gun violence. He and fellow co-founder Nicole Hockley, who lost her son Dylan in the shooting, were two of the nine plaintiffs in the Connecticut case against Jones. 

Still processing the film as he walked out of the theater, Barden said he was moved by the film. He said it was powerful and surreal to see his experience represented in such a way. 

“People need to consume this and understand it,” Barden said of the movie. “Think about it, try to understand how people are even prone to believe such absurdity and lock into it, and think how we can recover from or correct for that.”

Bankston offered his praise to the filmmaker for bringing the story to life. Reed was “the right storyteller for this story,” he said.

Reed “treated the subject matter with the delicateness and nuance it deserved,” Bankston added, “and it was really satisfying to see these parents’ story told [in] this format. I've tried to tell it in a courtroom, but here I got to see a professional storyteller tell it, and it hit me hard.”

Judge Gamble declined to comment on the film, other than to say it was a strange experience to have cameras in the courtroom and that all parties agreed to them being there.

While juries in Texas and Connecticut awarded the parents a combined $1 billion in damages, the grim reality still remains that the tactics and rhetoric used by Jones to popularize his lie about Sandy Hook have been unleashed upon the world, to be used by others. It remains to be seen whether Jones (or any other conspiracy theorist for that matter) has learned a lesson from the historic damages award. 

For viewers searching for a solution to figures like Jones, Reed offers no clear answers. Instead, his film considers the consequences of following charismatic showmen down a road of lies. “I'm hoping that people watch this film and think about what are the risks we are taking by allowing free reign to people like Jones,” Reed said.

Looking back on the saga, Reed notes that the tactics used by Jones have hit the mainstream in the form of figures like former President Donald Trump, who has used the conspiracists’ lexicon to rail against shadowy figures in the so-called deep state and the so-called globalists bent on total control.

“That rhetoric, that discourse, that way of talking about the world and explain[ing] the world has become mainstream,” said Reed. “I don't mean that CNN is using the same terms of reference,” but “it's got a grip on the mainstream popular imagination.”

Reed doesn’t believe that harsh censorship is the answer to the problems of conspiracies and disinformation. Nonetheless, his documentary reminds viewers that when lies are harmful enough, they can lead to consequences not just for the victims but for the liars. As he tells viewers throughout his film: “Speech should always be free, but lies must be paid for.”

Follow @KirkReportsNews
Categories / Arts, Courts, Media

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...