Iowa Caucus Results Delayed Amid Reporting ‘Inconsistencies’

Caucus-goers check in before Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., speaks Monday at a caucus at Roosevelt Hight School, in Des Moines, Iowa. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

DES MOINES, Iowa (CN) — Iowa Democratic Party officials said “inconsistencies” in numbers coming in Monday night from precinct caucuses were to blame for the party’s delay in publicly reporting statewide results of the closely watched race.

As of Tuesday morning, the Iowa Democratic Party was still had not reported any official results from Monday night’s 1,678 precinct caucuses. It was not clear when it would, as state party officials said Tuesday they are focusing on what caused the delay and assuring the numbers are accurate when they are released.

Precinct caucus results were coming into Democratic Party headquarters from a newly created mobile app as well as from caucus leaders who phoned in results or sent cellphone photos of tabulation sheets, and party officials had problems matching the different numbers Monday night.

“As precinct caucus results started coming in,” Iowa Democratic Party Chair Troy Price said in a statement released Tuesday morning, the party “ran them through an accuracy and quality check. It became clear that there were inconsistencies with the reports. The underlying cause of these inconsistencies was not immediately clear, and required investigation, which took time.”

While problems with the numbers were investigated, the party began taking data from caucus sites by phone and entering the numbers manually. “This took longer than expected,” Price said.

There were conflicting accounts Monday night about the source of the inconsistencies, including reports that precinct leaders were not adequately trained on the party’s mobile app for reporting numbers, which was used for the first time this year.

Although party officials had insisted Monday night that the reporting app had not been hacked, or that it crashed, Price said Tuesday the app was not giving complete data.

“As part of our investigation, we determined with certainty that the underlying data collected via the app was sound,” he said. “While the app was recording data accurately, it was reporting out only partial data. We have determined that this was due to a coding issue in the reporting system. This issue was identified and fixed.”

Price said precinct caucus results were still being reported to the party Tuesday morning, and that “while our plan is to release results as soon as possible today, our ultimate goal is to ensure that the integrity and accuracy of the process continues to be upheld.”

The Iowa Democratic Party will have a paper trail to verify results reported from Monday’s precincts caucuses: For the first time, caucus participants signed a card with their preferred candidate on the front and their second choice on the back if necessary. These cards will be turned into the Iowa Democratic Party in the event a recount is needed.

Party officials arranged a telephone conference call Monday night with the campaign representatives, but the party made no predictions about when results would be known, so candidates began making appearances at their post-caucus rallies to give what might have been victory speeches before heading off to New Hampshire.

The Democratic Party officially declares the winner of the Iowa caucuses based on what are called “delegate equivalents” – which is the number of delegates a candidate will take to the party’s state convention based on a mathematical formula weighted to compensate rural counties for their population disadvantage compared with urban counties. This functions somewhat like the Electoral College at the federal level.

In addition to delegate equivalents, this year for the first time the Iowa Democratic Party also released raw numbers showing how much support presidential candidates have among caucus participants. Those raw numbers will be based on two separate counts at each caucus location. The “first alignment” of supporters for each candidate was followed by a second count after participants whose favorite candidate did not have 15% of voters at that caucus lined up behind a candidate who did have 15%.

%d bloggers like this: