Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Thursday, April 25, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Top EU court won’t force bloc to enact public-sector union deal

Nearly 10 million public-sector employees across Europe are not covered by labor protections given to other EU workers, and the bloc’s high court declined to force a change in rules.

LUXEMBOURG (CN) — The European Union’s top court sided with the bloc's executive body over labor unions on Thursday in a dispute over protections for public-sector workers. 

The European Court of Justice upheld a lower court ruling finding that the European Commission was not required to bring a labor agreement before the European Council, where it could become legally binding. 

“It is for the Commission to decide whether or not to submit a proposal for a legislative act,” the Luxembourg-based court wrote. 

The complaint was brought by the European Public Service Union, an umbrella organization of more than 200 unions representing the interests of public-sector workers across the EU.

In 2015, trade unions negotiated an agreement for civil servants employed by national governments to extend to those workers – nearly 10 million across the continent – the same protections granted by the EU to other employees. Specifically, public-sector workers lack the same right to be informed or consulted about contract or employment conditions.

In 2018, then-European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker refused to send the labor agreement to the European Council, made up of the heads of state of each EU country.

The EPSU challenged this decision and lost before the European General Court, the EU’s lower court, in 2018. In that ruling, the General Court found that the commission had no legal obligation to move forward on the agreement. The group appealed that decision, arguing the lower court interpreted too broadly the commission’s latitude to make such decisions. 

The Court of Justice's 15-judge panel disagreed Thursday.

“The General Court did not expand the Commission’s role at the expense of the role of the social partners and of the Council in the procedure laid down in [Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union],” the ruling states.

In its arguments before the court, the EPSU conceded that the commission had the authority to choose what to move forward to the council. If the EPSU’s arguments were accepted, it would create “an obligation on the Commission, in all circumstances, to submit to the Council a proposal for a decision implementing at EU level the agreement concluded between management and labour,” the court found. The judges declined to establish such an obligation.

EPSU General Secretary Jan Willem Goudriaan blasted the ruling in a statement Thursday.

“This is a very damaging ruling. It is now for the Commission to undo the harm it has caused, restore trust and work with the social partners on a transparent processing of EU sectoral and intersectoral social partner agreements," he said.

Generally, the EU sets a standard floor regarding labor regulations and countries are free to set their standards higher if they choose. For example, the EU mandates that all employees be given at least four weeks of annual paid leave, though the minimum requirement in most countries is higher. 

Follow Molly Quell on Twitter

Follow @mollyquell
Categories / Appeals, Employment, Government, International

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...