Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Thursday, July 25, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service


ST. PAUL, Minn. — The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled the state’s interference with privacy statute doesn’t apply to the conduct of a defendant who recorded a woman while she was naked in bed without her consent. The statute applies to individuals who record “through the window or any other aperture of a house or place of dwelling of another,” and does not extend to recordings of someone taken while in the same room as that person.

Read the opinion here.

Categories / Appeals, Briefs, Criminal, Law

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.