Saturday, November 26, 2022 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service


ST. PAUL, Minn. — The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled the state’s interference with privacy statute doesn’t apply to the conduct of a defendant who recorded a woman while she was naked in bed without her consent. The statute applies to individuals who record “through the window or any other aperture of a house or place of dwelling of another,” and does not extend to recordings of someone taken while in the same room as that person.

Read the opinion here.

Read the Top 8

Sign up for the Top 8, a roundup of the day's top stories delivered directly to your inbox Monday through Friday.