Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Wednesday, July 17, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Oregonians Can’t|Get The Deer Back

(CN) - An Oregon appeals court ruled that a couple can not reclaim a black-tailed deer named "Snowball" because they do not have a permit to hold a wild animal.

After the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife seized the deer from Filipetti and Francesca Mantei, the couple sought the "return or restoration of things seized," under state law.

The couple argued that because the agency did not press criminal charges for possessing a wild animal without a permit, the deer should be returned because it was no longer needed for evidence.

The state agency argued that the couple had to have a permit to hold the animal, to satisfy the entitlement language in the state restoration statute.

Agreeing with the agency and reversing the trial court, the appeals court ruled that the restoration statute requires the couple to lawfully possess the animal. Without a permit to hold Snowball, the couple can't lawfully possess the deer.

Categories / Uncategorized

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.