Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Thursday, April 18, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

North Carolina Supreme Court re-hears landmark education case after flip to GOP majority

The North Carolina Supreme Court is rehearing a landmark education case for the fifth time, after GOP leaders' push to avoid paying for additional resources at underfunded public schools.

RALEIGH, N.C. (CN) — The North Carolina Supreme Court held oral arguments Thursday to determine the fate of a landmark education case that guarantees children a basic education.

Five school districts and families of their students sued the state in 1994 arguing their districts weren't getting enough funding to provide students with equal education.

The "Leandro" case, which gets its shorthand from the last name of a middle-school plaintiff, gave way to additional statewide funding for K-12 public schools, focused on employing qualified staff and providing adequate resources.

At nearly 30 years old, this is the fifth time it is in front of the Supreme Court, appealed now by Republican leaders who don’t believe the court has the power to make them allocate the funding.

The Supreme Court has ruled twice, once in 1997 and again in 2004, that students have a right to a “sound basic education” under the North Carolina constitution. In 2018, a third-party mediator was ordered to create an 8-year plan to resolve funding inequality and resolve educational issues. The plan was anticipated to cost $6.8 billion and last through 2028. 

In 2021, a trial court ruled that state executives needed to move $1.75 billion out of the state treasury to cover unfunded Leandro expenses under a comprehensive remedial plan. The Supreme Court held in early 2022 that the state was responsible to fund the plan, but couldn't be ordered to do so. The Supreme Court met again for arguments in August of 2022, where they decided that the legislature must provide funding for the plan. 

Several days after the Supreme Court issued their ruling in November 2022, the court flipped from a 4-3 Democrat majority to a Republican-controlled 5-2. The judges voted along party lines to rehear, with Republicans wanting to review the case with their new majority. 

Leandro funding has been caught in political limbo as a superior court judge told legislators last April that they owe over $677 million to address lacking education during recent school years. The Hoke County plaintiffs say educational gaps are now worse than they were when the lawsuit began.  

During the long session last year, GOP state legislators passed funding for universal private school vouchers in the state budget, almost tripling state spending on private education. An analysis conducted by the Office of State Budget and Management said that if half of the voucher recipients decide to enroll in private school, it could cost public schools over $200 million — and far more to pay for the cost of students already privately enrolled. Supporters of Leandro worry the vouchers are going to exacerbate issues in public schools as their funding sees cuts.  

Senate President Phil Berger and House Speaker Tim Moore sued in February 2023 to prevent the distribution of Leandro funds from the treasury, challenging the court’s authority to control the way the legislature allocates funding. The lawmakers also argued that the court should be restricted to focus only on Hoke County schools and that trial courts were outside of their jurisdiction in requiring state-wide public funding. 

“What a sad moment in our history when legislative leaders ask the North Carolina Supreme Court to invalidate what a bipartisan court has affirmed for decades: the State Constitution gives our children the right to a sound basic education,” Democrat Governor Roy Cooper said

Normally, appeals to Supreme Court rulings are filed within 30 days of their decision. The appeal in this case was filed several months later. 

Protesters outside the courthouse Thursday morning speculated it was because the politicians were waiting for the court to flip. 

“They waited to do this until they had the majority in the Supreme Court, and now they have it and they think they can win,” said Jen Sanders, a candidate for the Union County School Board who drove nearly three hours to get to the protest. “We’re not going to let them, we’re going to hold them accountable.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Among the justices on the Supreme Court is Phil Berger Jr., Senator Berger’s son. The plaintiffs had asked Berger Jr. to recuse himself, but the court ruled against it, with only Democrats Allison Riggs and Anita Earls dissenting. 

Rev. William Barber II, who spoke to protesting crowds outside of the Supreme Court, called Berger’s actions a “violation of power.” 

“To have his son on the court, and his son doesn’t recuse himself, it is unconstitutional and ungodly,” he said. “The Supreme Court has already spoken on this. This is an attempt at a hostile takeover.” 

In court Thursday, Associate Justice Richard Dietz pointed to the age of the case and raised whether court should make decisions for students without their input, considering none of the original students who participated as plaintiffs are still in the public school system.

Robb Leandro, an eighth grader when the suit was filed, has graduated and now holds a law degree.

“I’m thinking about the students," Dietz said. "I want to do what all the parties are saying in their briefing, which is this case needs to get to the outcome, which is to cure a very serious violation of the constitutional rights of students in our state.”

Matthew Tilley, attorney for intervenor-defendants Tim Moore and Phil Berger, argued the court doesn’t have the power to force state lawmakers to allocate funding, citing the separation of powers.

“The fact that the state says that okay, we’re going to solve Hoke County’s problems with a statewide initiative, does not mean that the court has the power to order the state to implement those remedies anywhere other than where the violation is,” Tilley said.

Representatives for Hoke County and the State of North Carolina urged the court to uphold their prior ruling and require state executives to provide additional funding for K-12 public schools.

“I believe in this court, I believe in its authority to remedy constitutional violations that have been identified by this court and other courts,” said Ryan Park, attorney for the State of North Carolina. “I don’t think that anyone in this courtroom really believes that courts can lack the power categorically to remedy constitutional violations when that remedy might require the appropriation of funds.”

Addressing Dietz’s concerns over the students who will be impacted by the court’s decision was Melanie Black Dubis, an attorney representing Hoke County .

“You’ve asked about the children,” she said. “Sixty-nine percent of the state’s third through eighth graders cannot read at a level that the state standardized test says is Leandro compliant. That is 480,049 third through eighth graders — it doesn’t include the high schoolers — 480,049 children who will become the third generation of children since this lawsuit was filed to pass through our state school system without the benefit of relief.”

Outside the courtroom doors, well over a hundred people gathered to support Leandro. Cars with signs proclaiming “Fund schools with Leandro” honked loudly as they drove by. 

“This case was brought up in 1994 and our legislators are still fighting not to fund it.” said Sanders. “For us, it’s very important that we stand up for every student and every teacher in our districts and all over the state of North Carolina.”

The court did not say when it would announce a decision. 

Categories / Appeals, Education, Regional

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...