Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Saturday, June 15, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

No Cut for the State After Court Waives $1M Verdict

(CN) - Oregon cannot stake a claim to a settlement between Target and a former employee though the state stood to rake in $540,000 if judgment had been entered on a federal jury verdict for nearly $1 million in damages, the 9th Circuit ruled Monday.

James Patton sued the retailer for wrongful termination after he was demoted and eventually fired allegedly over his service in the National Guard. A jury awarded Patton $17,950 in economic damages, $67,000 in noneconomic damages and $900,000 in punitive damages.

Under the state's split-recovery statute, Oregon is entitled to 60 percent of any punitive damages awarded under its laws. Before judgment was entered on the verdict, Patton and Target settled without notifying or getting approval from the state.

The trial court accepted the settlement, dismissed the complaint with prejudice and denied Oregon's motion for relief.

Not happy with being excluded from the deal, Oregon asked the appeals court to throw out the settlement.In an unsigned opinion, the three-judge panel in Portland upheld the post-verdict settlement. The judges explained that they sought guidance from the state supreme court about whether Oregon needed to consent to the settlement.

Categories / Uncategorized

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.