Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Friday, May 3, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Ninth Circuit throws out vaccine mandate for California prison guards

The court overturned a judge's finding that the state's vaccination policy for prison staff amounted to deliberate indifference to inmates' health.

(CN) — A Ninth Circuit panel on Monday overturned a federal judge's order requiring all prison staff in California to get vaccinated against Covid-19, a mandate that had been opposed by the state government and the politically powerful prison guards' union.

The San Francisco-based appellate court on Monday agreed with the state and the union that California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation's failure to implement a vaccine requirement for all prison staff, as opposed to only those working in a health care setting, didn't amount to deliberate indifference to inmates’ serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment.

The department’s Covid-19 vaccination policy wasn't deliberately indifferent, the appellate panel said, because CDCR took significant action to address the health risks posed by Covid-19, including making vaccines and booster doses available to prisoners and correctional staff, enacting policies to encourage and facilitate staff and prisoner vaccination, requiring staff to wear personal protective equipment, and ensuring unvaccinated staff members regularly test for Covid-19.

"A decision to adopt an approach that is not the most medically efficacious does not itself establish deliberate indifference," the panel found in a per curiam memorandum. "And the record does not include evidence demonstrating how much more effective a vaccine mandate would be compared to defendants’ existing measures to mitigate the introduction and spread of Covid-19 in a custodial environment, nor is it clear from the record that this is an unquantifiable figure."

This past September, U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar ordered the state to carry out a court-appointed receiver’s recommendation that all prison staff be vaccinated. The Barack Obama appointee is overseeing a two-decade class action over inadequate medical care and prison overcrowding, and issued the vaccination mandate at the request of a federal receiver appointed to manage the prison health care system.

In December, the Ninth Circuit temporarily blocked the mandate from taking effect by Jan. 12 as Tigar had ordered until it could hear oral arguments.

Though his administration had at one time ordered vaccinations or testing for all state employees, including those in the prison system, Governor Gavin Newsom’s office stepped in to oppose the mandate. He was joined by the politically powerful California Correctional Peace Officers Association, who argued that 700 of its members might have chosen to resign or retire rather than accept the vaccine, leading to staffing shortages that could undermine safety.

U.S. Circuit Judges Morgan Christen and Daniel Bress, and U.S. District Judge Gary Feinerman, sitting by designation from the Northern District of Illinois, made up the panel. Christen and Feinerman are Obama appointees, and Donald Trump appointed Bress.

Follow @edpettersson
Categories / Appeals, Employment, Government, Health

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...