Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Sunday, April 21, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

‘Lie after lie after lie,’ Avenatti’s second fraud trial in New York moves to jury deliberations

The indicted ex-lawyer of Stormy Daniels focused his closing arguments on what he called his good-faith belief that he should be compensated for making his porn star former client a household name and author.

MANHATTAN (CN) — “He was pretending to fight for Ms. Daniels when he was the one scamming her,” federal prosecutors said on Wednesday, delivering summations in the criminal trial of Michael Avenatti, the once-high profile California lawyer accused of helping himself to nearly $300,000 that his former client, adult film actress Stormy Daniels, was advanced by her publishers.

“The defendant was a lawyer who stole from his own client,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Sobelman said in a one-hour closing argument Wednesday morning.  “She thought he was her advocate, but he betrayed her and he told lies to cover it all up.”

Closings followed five days of testimony from government witnesses in support of criminal indictment alleging that Avenatti diverted nearly $300,000 from the $800,000 that a publisher had advanced to Daniels for her tell-all 2018 autobiography, and then “strung her along with lie after lie after lie” to keep her in the dark about his fraud.

Installments of the advance payments Daniels had earned were rerouted to a trust account Avenatti controlled. Prosecutors allege that Avenatti accomplished this by forging Daniels' signature in an August 2018 letter to her literary agent.

If found guilty on counts of wire fraud and aggravated identity theft, Avenatti, who turns 51 later this month, faces up to 22 years in prison.

After wavering for days about whether he would testify in his own defense — and being cautioned by U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman that brash lawyer’s 2020 conviction for extorting Nike and general track record of dishonesty would be fair game during the government's cross-examination — Avenatti rested his defense case on Tuesday morning without calling any witnesses.

Avenatti, who is suspended from practicing law in California, elected last week to abandon his public attorneys from Federal Defenders of New York and represent himself for the remainder of the trial in Manhattan federal court.

"What he says is not evidence," Judge Furman advised jurors on Wednesday morning prior to Avenatti's closing summation, explaining that the defendant's closing argument is not his testimony.

Prosecutors said that Avenatti texted Daniels “let me check” about missing installments of book advance while he spent her publishing money on car payments, airfare, his ex-wife, his girlfriend and payroll for his debt-ridden law firm.

“He and his law firm were broke,” Sobelman said Wednesday. “That explains why he stole Ms. Daniels’ money, but it doesn’t excuse his crimes.”

“He spent the stolen money on himself, his law firm and other close to him,” the prosecutor said during closing arguments.

Avenatti told jurors during his closing summation he understands if some of them admire Stormy Daniels, because he once did too. "I was her advocate. I was her champion,” he said. “The evidence shows that I put it all on the line for Ms. Daniels because I believed in her, and I wanted to help her. I too admired her, perhaps more than anyone else in her life."

“Let me be clear,” he said later, briefly referring to himself in third-person, “Michael Avenatti never committed the crime of wire fraud.

“Michael Avenatti never committed the crime of aggravated identity theft,” he continued. “There is insufficient evidence to show that Michael Avenatti ever intended to harm Stormy Daniels. There is insufficient evidence to show that Michael Avenatti ever sent an unauthorized and false letter to Luke Janklow to get the money for himself.”

Throughout the trial, Avenatti repeatedly directed witnesses and jurors to the attorney-client fee agreement he signed with Daniels in early 2018 — a document that he insists entitles him to “a reasonable percentage to be agreed upon” of the proceeds from any book or media opportunity.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The government never presented any evidence of what a reasonable percentage would be,” he said during his 90-minute closing summation. “The government proposes that me and my firm were to receive zero and therefore we could not have a good faith belief that we were entitled to some of the money.”

Establishing “a good faith belief in my mind that I was entitled to be paid,” Avenatti told jurors is "Game Over for the government.”

“Even if that belief is mistaken, then you must find him not guilty,” he said on Wednesday, directly quoting the charging instructions that Judge Furman would later give to the jurors.

“The case that the government is attempting to feed you has a giant cockroach in the middle of the plate," Avenatti told jurors at the conclusion of his summation. "Would you eat that dish or would you send it back?”

“I submit that you would send it back, and when you deliberate, I ask that you do exactly that as it pertains to this case and send it back and find me not guilty, because, ladies and gentleman, that is exactly what I am.”

Ronald Richards, a Beverly Hills attorney and former NBC news legal analyst, told Courthouse News the fizzling out of Avenatti’s defense case without calling witnesses on Tuesday came as no surprise.

“Most of Michael Avenatti‘s witnesses were obvious attempts to try and focus the jury on irrelevant and collateral issues while dangling the specter of him testifying,” Richards told Courthouse News after Avenatti rested his defense case without calling a single witness. “What he didn’t anticipate was the judge was 10 steps in front of him to focus the case on these facts which were limited to whether or not an attorney could misappropriate client funds without their knowledge or consent.”

“The answer has always been, no, an attorney can’t,” Richards said. “An attorney also cannot create false authorizations to wire money elsewhere.  Without his testimony there is no basis to argue that he relied on a right to offset unspecified fees for his work and, unless the jury is swayed by some nonlegal argument or nullification, a conviction is highly probable.”

Daniels spent two days on the stand as the prosecution’s star witness, telling jurors last week that she had hired the California lawyer in early 2018 to represent her in her claims against former President Donald Trump. Daniels wanted out of a nondisclosure deal with Trump so she could speak publicly about having a sexual tryst with him. Trump has denied the claims.

On direct questioning last Thursday, Daniels explained that, of the four advance payments from her publishing deal with St. Martin’s Press, Avenatti diverted the second and third deposits from her literary agent into a separate trust account and lied to her for months about the status of those payments.

Daniels testified Avenatti told her he wouldn’t “take one penny” of her book payments because that was money she had earned.

The charges related to Daniels stem from the last of three criminal indictments filed against him in 2019. About six months ago, Avenatti was sentenced to 2 1/2 years in federal prison for trying to extort Nike. Those proceedings were in Manhattan federal court, where he now faces the charges related to Daniels. In the interim, there was a mistrial in California on unrelated charges against Avenatti.

Daniels published her memoir “Full Disclosure” in the fall of 2018, detailing a 2006 encounter with Trump and the subsequent hush-money payment facilitated by Trump’s then-personal attorney and fixer Michael Cohen ahead of the 2016 election.

Cohen would later plead guilty to making payments with the intent of influencing a federal election on Trump's behalf, but Trump denies that he and Daniels ever had sex.

Having served a year behind bars on his guilty plea before the court allowed him to finish his three-year prison term at his New York City apartment, Cohen returned to Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse in Lower Manhattan to attend multiple days of Avenatti’s trial.

Follow @jruss_jruss
Categories / Criminal, Entertainment, Law, Trials

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...