Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Tuesday, April 16, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Judge out in Scientology suit over forced marriage; plaintiff lawyer calls timing ‘highly suspicious’

The old judge had just issued a tentative ruling denying the church's motion to send the case to arbitration.

LOS ANGELES (CN) — A lawsuit filed by an unnamed woman against the church of Scientology and some of its officials over the alleged sexual abuse of a minor and the arrangement of a forced marriage between the minor and abuser hit a temporary snag on Tuesday after church leader David Miscavage filed a motion to remove the judge from the case.

The court was scheduled to hear arguments on the church's motion to force the case into Scientology's own internal arbitration process. On Monday night, Superior Court Judge Robert Broadbelt issued a tentative ruling denying that motion. He found that the contract the plaintiff was pressured into signing in 2002 was "so one-sided as to shock the conscience."

Miscavage, who has yet to make a formal appearance in the case and who for a time was dodging a summons, filed his motion for a new judge on Tuesday morning.

"The timing is highly suspicious," said Carmen Scott, the plaintiff's attorney, during a short hearing on Tuesday. "The tentative was issued last evening. We have not been served with Mr. Miscavage’s motion."

Nevertheless, Judge Broadbelt said he believed he was required by law to grant the motion. The case will be reassigned to a new judge, who will hear Scientology's motion to compel arbitration.

In her 2022 complaint the unnamed plaintiff described "a culture and atmosphere in which the sexual assault of minors within Church of Scientology International was tolerated, and even facilitated."

"It is common knowledge to members of Scientology that older members engage in illicit sexual activities with minors," the woman wrote in her complaint. "The practice is both endorsed and facilitated by the Scientology doctrine."

The plaintiff, known in the complaint as Jane Doe, said she was groomed by a recruiter for Sea Org, an elite unit within the church, named Gavin Potter, who sexually abused her in a car when she was 16 years old. (Potter was at least 26, according to the complaint.)

When she told a coworker about the incident, she and Potter were given a choice: be assigned to a work camp for misbehaving Sea Org members called Rehabilitation Project Force or get married.

"That same day, Jane Doe’s 'Port Captain' arranged for Jane Doe, Gavin Potter, and Jane Doe’s mother to travel to Las Vegas,
Nevada to complete the marriage," the plaintiff wrote in the complaint. "After the brief ceremony, the group immediately returned to Los Angeles, and Jane Doe went back to work."

Later that night, she wrote, "Gavin Potter had sexual intercourse with Jane Doe. Jane Doe did not want to have sex with him but felt coerced and compelled because of the forced marriage. Jane Doe described the intercourse as ritualistic and painful."

In 2002, when she was 27 years old, Jane Doe signed a contract with the church of Scientology and agreed that “any dispute, claim or controversy" between her and the church or a church official would be resolved “solely and exclusively through Scientology’s internal ethics, justice and binding religious arbitration procedures.”

The agreement added, “I am forever abandoning, surrendering, waiving, and relinquishing my right to sue, or otherwise seek legal recourse with respect to any dispute, claim or controversy against the Church.”

In his 20-page tentative ruling, which now is all but meaningless, Judge Broadbelt wrote that the arbitration clause was invalid for two reasons. Firstly, it was voided by a 2022 federal law, the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act, which voids pre-dispute arbitration clauses in sexual harassment cases.

Secondly, Broadbelt found that the arbitration clause was "unconscionable" since Jane Doe lacked any sort of "negotiation or meaningful choice" when she signed her contract — one that was "so one-sided as to shock the conscience," since Jane Doe agreed to give up so many rights and the church agreed to sacrifice so few.

This is the second time this month that Miscavage has gotten a judge removed in a case against him and the religious organization he's headed since 1986. Miscavage filed a peremptory challenge in actress Leah Remini's suit against the church for defamation and harassment. The old judge earlier this year significantly pared down that complaint following an anti-SLAPP motion.

That the suit was allowed to survive at all was apparently not to the church's liking; the organization has appealed the ruling.

The church of Scientology is also battling a third suit in LA Superior court, filed by three women who accuse the church of covering up sexual assaults they experienced at the hands of actor Danny Masterson, who was sentenced last year to 30 years to life in prison for rape. The suit survived an anti-SLAPP motion last month.

Follow @hillelaron
Categories / Courts, Religion

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...