Hong Kong Leader Bans Masks as Tensions Increase

Masked protesters hold up their hands to represent their five demands in Hong Kong on Friday. City CEO Carrie Lam has banned wearing masks in public, effective Saturday. (AP photo/Vincent Yu)

HONG KONG (AP) — Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam banned protesters from wearing masks Friday in a hardening of the government’s stance on the territory’s most disruptive crisis since it reverted to Chinese rule in 1997.

Lam announced the ban at an afternoon news conference where she decried a recent escalation of violence after four months of anti-government demonstrations.

The mask ban, imposed under a colonial-era Emergency Ordinance, takes effect Saturday. It applies to unauthorized public gatherings and police-approved protests.

Lam said she would go to the legislature to get legal backing for the rule. She said that the use of emergency powers does not mean Hong Kong is in a state of emergency.

“People are asking can Hong Kong go back to normal? Is Hong Kong still a place where we can have our sweet home?” Lam said as she announced the ban.

“We must stop the violence,” she said. “Now it’s all over Hong Kong.”

Yet even as Lam wrapped up her announcement, protesters in masks and concealing themselves under umbrellas gathered in central Hong Kong.

Lam said the ban targets violent protesters and rioters and “will be an effective deterrent to radical behavior.” Masks will be permitted for “legitimate need,” when their wearers can prove that they need them for work, health or religious reasons.

The ban makes the wearing of full or partial face coverings at public gatherings, including face paint, punishable by one year in jail. A six-month jail term could be imposed on people who refuse a police officer’s order to remove a face covering for identification.

Lam would not rule out a further toughening of measures if violence continues. She said she would not resign because “stepping down is not something that will help the situation” when Hong Kong is facing “a very critical state of public danger.”

“We must save Hong Kong, the present Hong Kong and the future Hong Kong,” she said. “We can’t just leave the situation to get worse and worse.”

Thousands of masked protesters marched in the city’s business district before Lam spoke. They chanted, “I want to wear face masks,” and, “Wearing mask is not a crime,” as many cars, stuck in traffic due to the march, honked in support.

“Will they arrest 100,000 people on the street? The government is trying to intimidate us, but at this moment I don’t think the people will be scared,” one protester, who gave his surname as Lui, told an online live broadcast.

At the nearby Causeway Bay shopping area, a huge crowd occupied streets to protest the mask ban. Smaller rallies were held in several other areas.

Face masks have become a hallmark of protesters in Hong Kong, even at peaceful marches. As the use of police tear gas has become widespread, many protesters have worn heavier duty gear, including full gas masks and goggles.

Even peaceful masked marchers cite fears they could lose jobs and be denied access to schools, public housing and other government-funded services if identified as having taken part in demonstrations.

Many are concerned that their identities could be shared with the massive state-security apparatus that helps keep the Communist Party in power across the border in mainland China, where high-tech surveillance including facial recognition technology is ubiquitous.

Analysts said the use of the Emergency Ordinance for the first time in more than half a century set a dangerous precedent. The law, a relic of British rule enacted in 1922 to quell a seamen’s strike and last used to crush riots in 1967, gives broad powers to the city’s chief executive to implement regulations in an emergency.

“Even though the mask ban is just a small move under the Emergency Ordinance, it is a dangerous first step. If the anti-mask legislation proves to be ineffective, it could lead the way to more draconian measures such as a curfew and other infringement of civil liberties,” said Willy Lam, adjunct professor at the Chinese University.

Lam bristled at a suggestion that the ban pushes Hong Kong closer to the authoritarian rule imposed by the Communist Party across the rest of China. She said she was not acting under orders from the central government in Beijing, which she visited this week when Communist Party leaders celebrated 70 years in power Tuesday.

The ban followed widespread violence in the city on Tuesday that coincided with China’s National Day and included a police officer shooting a protester, the first victim of gunfire since the protests started in June over a now-shelved extradition bill. The wounded teenager was criminally charged with attacking police and rioting.

The movement has snowballed into an anti-China campaign amid anger over Beijing’s interference in Hong Kong’s autonomy. More than 1,750 people have been arrested.

Activists and many legislators have said the mask ban could be counterproductive, impractical and difficult to enforce in a city bubbling with anger, where tens of thousands have defied police bans on rallies.

The government in September withdrew the extradition bill, widely slammed as an example of the erosion of Hong Kong’s freedom, but protesters have widened their demands to include direct elections of the city’s leaders, an independent inquiry into police brutality, the unconditional release of protesters and not characterizing the protests as riots.

“Five demands, not one less!” many protesters shouted during Friday’s rallies as they held up five fingers.

%d bloggers like this: