(CN) - A Home Depot employee did not prove that her firing for violating company policy was merely a pretext for sex-based discrimination, the 6th Circuit ruled.
Sharon Turnbull Sybrant worked at a Home Depot in Nashville for more than 14 years, rising to the position of assistant manager.
However, she was fired in 2006 for violating the company's "no self-service" policy. Home Depot employees are not allowed to use their passwords to ring up their own merchandise.
Sybrant, noting that she was replaced by a man, complained that her firing was based on a pretext of gender discrimination. She alleged that:
- Home Depot did not disseminate information regarding its strict interpretation of the "no-self-serve" policy;
- Her supervisor did not seem concerned about her entering notes on her own transaction; and
- Her actions did not demonstrate a lack of integrity.
Judge Gilman of the Cincinnati-based federal appeals court agreed with the trial court's summary judgment.
Gilman ruled that Sybrant's three allegations did not bring a genuine issue of fact regarding the company's true reason for firing her.
"We conclude that a reasonable jury could not find that the application of Home Depot's self-service rule to Sybrandt was so unreasonable as to be disbelieved."
Subscribe to Closing Arguments
Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.