Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Wednesday, April 23, 2025

View Back issues

Eddie Money SLAPP

Rock star Eddie Money’s decision to fire his drummer amounted to protected activity for the purpose of his anti-SLAPP motion to strike the drummer’s <a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/drummer-sues-eddie-money/">lawsuit</a>, a California appellate panel <a href="http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/B283529.PDF"><strong>ruled</strong></a> Friday, leaving it for the trial court to decide whether the drummer still has a chance of prevailing on the merits.

LOS ANGELES – Rock star Eddie Money’s decision to fire his drummer amounted to protected activity for the purpose of his anti-SLAPP motion to strike the drummer’s lawsuit, a California appellate panel ruled Friday, leaving it for the trial court to decide whether the drummer still has a chance of prevailing on the merits.

Categories / Employment, Entertainment

Subscribe to our free newsletters

Our weekly newsletter Closing Arguments offers the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world, while the monthly Under the Lights dishes the legal dirt from Hollywood, sports, Big Tech and the arts.

Loading...