Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Friday, April 26, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Confusion & Fear on the Border Under New US Policy

Asylum-seekers gathered in Nuevo Laredo, across the border from Laredo, Texas, grappled to understand what a new U.S. policy that all but eliminates refugee claims from Central Americans and others will mean for their search for a better life in America amid a chaos of rumors, confusion and fear.

NUEVO LAREDO, Mexico (AP) — Asylum-seekers gathered in Nuevo Laredo, across the border from Laredo, Texas, grappled to understand what a new U.S. policy that all but eliminates refugee claims from Central Americans and others will mean for their search for a better life in America amid a chaos of rumors, confusion and fear.

The policy went into effect Tuesday and represents the most forceful attempt to date by President Trump to slash the number of people seeking asylum in the United States. It denies asylum to anyone who shows up on the Mexican border after traveling through another country, something Central Americans have to do. The policy already has been challenged in federal court. Immigration attorneys say the policy clearly violates U.S. and international law, including the Geneva Conventions.

In some parts of Nuevo Laredo, people continued to trickle into shelters, including seven members of a family from the Mexican state of Michoacán, who fled the shootings and extortions in their violent region and were happy to find shelter even though some had to sleep in the hallway. They hoped they could get political asylum because they did not pass through another country to reach the border.

But about 70 mostly Central Americans, who had crossed Mexico to reach the border, were returned to Mexico with an appointment with a judge tucked in a transparent plastic bag. They assembled in the National Institute of Migration facility next to the international bridge, with a cluster of women cradling children, men asking questions and small children running around under the watchful eye of parents.

"They didn't deport us but they took us out (of the U.S.) in a bad way; in theory we wait for an audience," said Nolvin Godoy, a 29-year-old Guatemalan who has gone deep into debt paying a coyote almost $10,000 to take him, his wife and her 2-year-old son to get them across the Rio Grande to turn themselves in to U.S. authorities.

After 10 days in a detention center in the United States, they say, they were given an appointment with a judge in September to seek asylum. Now they've been sent back to Mexico and hold out little hope of being able to appear before the judge on the date set.

"Today the law fell on us and they are going to take us to Monterrey, 200 kilometers from Nuevo Laredo, and we don't know what is going happen after that because we don't know anyone; I am sinking into debt," Godoy said.

Mexican immigration officials gave them food and a document guaranteeing them access to official programs but which does not specify which ones, though Mexico has said the de facto U.S. deportees will be able to get jobs. They received an official telephone number and email where they can get advice.

Godoy, who says the stained shirt on his back is his only possession, believes it will all be worth little if he has no means of survival. "Maybe it's best to go back," he said.

No immigrants dare to go outside the Mexican immigration installations. "Outside is organized crime," he said.

Dozens of people like Godoy were returned to Nuevo Laredo on Tuesday and by nightfall had been put on a bus with the only explanation that they were being taken to Monterrey, in the neighboring state of Nuevo Leon. Some said they had not planned to request asylum in the United States, and said the idea occurred to them when they were offered the option.

However, as late as Tuesday morning a group of 15 people, including four children, showed up at the international bridge because their names had come up on the list used to allow people to request asylum. The idea that the old process might continue to work gave some hope to Linerio Gonzalez, 24, and Ana Paolini, 20, who fled Venezuela for political reasons. It was unclear whether the new measures would change things for Venezuelans like them.

"It drives you to desperation," said Gonzalez.

"You hear a lot of things, but we don't know," Paolini said, adding that the prospect of being able to file for asylum, only to be returned to Nuevo Laredo, fills her with fear.

The Rev. Julio López, director of the Roman Catholic shelter Albergue Nazaret, said the border was in the grips "of a lot of confusion because of all the changes."

Lopez said the situation has become worse, and human traffickers were likely to be the only winners.

On top of it, more deportees might be expected from planned raids in the United States, something that could overwhelm shelters.

"Added to all this is now the uncertainty about mass deportations that could put our shelters in a difficult position," said Rev. Lopez.

Categories / Civil Rights, Government, International

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...