Clinton, DNC Falsified Finance Records to Hide Dossier Ties, Complaint Says | Courthouse News Service
Tuesday, November 28, 2023
Courthouse News Service
Tuesday, November 28, 2023 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Clinton, DNC Falsified Finance Records to Hide Dossier Ties, Complaint Says

A nonpartisan group of election law experts on Wednesday accused the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's 2016 president campaign of violating federal financial disclosure laws to hide payments for a dossier that alleged connections between then-candidate Donald Trump and Russia.

(CN) - A nonpartisan group of election law experts on Wednesday accused the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign of violating federal financial disclosure laws to hide payments for a dossier that alleged connections between then-candidate Donald Trump and Russia.

In a complaint filed with the Federal Election Commission, the Campaign Legal Center says the Clinton campaign and DNC failed to file accurate records in violation of both commission regulations and the Federal Election Campaign Act.

"Specifically, the DNC and Hillary for America reported dozens of payments totaling millions of dollars to the law firm Perkins Coie with the purpose described as "Legal Services" or "Legal and Compliance Consulting," when in reality, at least some of those payments were earmarked for the firm Fusion GPS, with the purpose of conducting opposition research in Donald Trump," the complaint says.

"By failing to file accurate reports, the DNC and Hillary for America undermined the viral public information role that reporting is intended to serve," the complaint says.

In a written statement, Adav Noti, a senior director of the Campaign Legal Center said the alleged acts of the Democrats and the Clinton campaign "undermined the vital public information role of campaign disclosures.”

"Voters need campaign disclosure laws to be enforced so they can hold candidates accountable for how they raise and spend money. The FEC must investigate this apparent violation and take appropriate action,” Noti said.

Neither Hillary Clinton nor the DNC responded to a request for comment on Wednesday afternoon.

Graham M. Wilson, a partner at Perkins Coie, said in a written statement that “Hillary for America and the DNC complied with all campaign finance laws, including their obligations to appropriately report and describe the purpose of all of their expenditures.

"This research work was to support the provision of legal services, and payments made by vendors to sub-vendors are not required to be disclosed in circumstances like this. This complaint fails to even note the Federal Election Commission's affirmation in 2013 of the relevant rule, notes no authority to the contrary, and is patently baseless," Wilson said.

That didn't stop President Donald Trump from claiming Wednesday that Clinton's campaign paid nearly $6 million for the dossier alleging ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.

In an interview set to air Wednesday night on Fox Business Network's "Lou Dobbs Tonight," Trump ripped the dossier as "a total phony" and "disgraceful," alleging that the Clinton campaign spent almost $6 million to fund the research.

"Don’t forget Hillary Clinton totally denied this. She didn’t know anything. She knew nothing," the  president said. "All of a sudden they found out. What I was amazed at, it’s almost $6 million that they paid and it’s totally discredited, it’s a total phony. I call it fake news. It’s disgraceful. It’s disgraceful."

The Washington Post broke the story Tuesday, reporting that both the Clinton campaign and the DNC funded the research contained in the dossier, which alleges coordination between members of Trump's presidential campaign and Russia.

The Post said the campaign paid Perkins Coie $5.6 million between June 2015  and December 2016, and that Marc Elias, a lawyer representing both  the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained Fusion GPS's services in April 2016.


The dossier contends that Russia was engaged in a long-standing effort to aid Trump and had amassed compromising information about the Republican. Trump has repeatedly dismissed the document as false and in recent days has questioned whether Democrats or the FBI had helped fund it.

Trump immediately seized on the Washington Post report, telling White House pool reporters Wednesday morning that it showed his opponents made up "the white Russia hoax" and that the Democrats continued to push the "phony" narrative as "an excuse for losing an election.”

"It's just really — it's a very sad commentary on politics in this country," Trump said.

The new disclosure is likely to fuel his complaints that the document is a collection of salacious and uncorroborated claims, and that claims of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign are totally false.

The allegations are the focus of an ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller, and it has been reported that his team recently spoke with Christopher Steele, the former British spy who helped compile it the material.

Trump also has challenged the findings of the FBI, NSA and CIA that Russia waged a large-scale influence campaign to interfere in the election. The FBI and the CIA have said with high confidence that the effort was aimed at hurting Clinton's candidacy and helping Trump. The NSA found the same with "moderate" confidence.

Catherine Hinckley Kelley, who filed the complaint on behalf of the Campaign Legal Center, is asking the Federal Election Commission to investigate the organization's claims, and, if the allegations are proven, to sanction the defendants and enjoin them from committing further violations.

In more news related to the 2016 campaign, the White House on Wednesday strongly denied a Daily Beast report that the head of a data analytics firm that worked for President Trump’s campaign reached out to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange about locating Hillary Clinton’s so-called "missing" emails.

According to the report,  Alexander Nix, who leads Cambridge Analytica, reportedly told a third party that he reached out to Assange to see if Nix’s firm could help Assange release Clinton’s 33,000 missing emails.

Assange reportedly told Nix he preferred to do the work on his own.

Later on Wednesday, the Daily Beast said   Assange confirmed  that Cambridge Analytica approached WikiLeaks, but said the site rejected the firm.

Early Wednesday event, Michael Glassner, executive director of Donald J. Trump for President, issued a statements refuting the claims in the story.

“Once President Trump secured the nomination in 2016, one of the most important decisions we made was to partner with the Republican National Committee on data analytics," Glassner said. "Leading into the election, the RNC had invested in the most sophisticated data targeting program in modern American in history, which helped secure our victory in the fall. We were proud to have worked with the RNC and its data experts and relied on them as our main source for data analytics.

"We as a campaign made the choice to rely on the voter data of the Republican National Committee to help elect President Donald J. Trump. Any claims that voter data from any other source played a key role in the victory are false," Glassner added.

The Daily Beast responded with a second report that said Nix wrote in an email last year that he reached out to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange about Hillary Clinton’s missing 33,000 emails. It did not say it had a copy of the email or link it to the story.

It did say Cambridge Analytica did not provide a comment for the story before it was published.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Categories / Government, International, National, Politics

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.