The ruling strikes down a so-called trigger ban passed in 2007 that took effect when the U.S. Supreme Court effectively nullified Roe v. Wade in 2022.
The ruling strikes down a so-called trigger ban passed in 2007 that took effect when the U.S. Supreme Court effectively nullified Roe v. Wade in 2022.
A county auditor claimed he would have to forego his duties in counting ballots because he feared prosecution, a notion the judge called "a concerning position for an elected official to take."
The federal judge had set a deadline of Dec. 22, 2023, for lawmakers to come up with redistricting that didn't dilute the voting power of two Native American tribes.
The ruling strikes down a so-called trigger ban passed in 2007 that took effect when the U.S. Supreme Court effectively nullified Roe v. Wade in 2022.
The ruling strikes down a so-called trigger ban passed in 2007 that took effect when the U.S. Supreme Court effectively nullified Roe v. Wade in 2022.
The ruling strikes down a so-called trigger ban passed in 2007 that took effect when the U.S. Supreme Court effectively nullified Roe v. Wade in 2022.
The ruling strikes down a so-called trigger ban passed in 2007 that took effect when the U.S. Supreme Court effectively nullified Roe v. Wade in 2022.
The ruling strikes down a so-called trigger ban passed in 2007 that took effect when the U.S. Supreme Court effectively nullified Roe v. Wade in 2022.