OLYMPIA, Wash. (CN) - The Washington Supreme Court ruled that officers can get a search warrant for a blood test if a driver refuses to take a voluntary breath test. It also ruled that officers don't have to tell drivers of their intent to seek the warrant for a blood test.
The court ruled that getting a warrant for a driver who declines a breath test does not violate consent laws or due process rights.
"The legislative intent is plain on the face of the statute that an officer may obtain a blood alcohol test pursuant to a warrant regardless of the implied consent statute," the opinion states.
Washington state law allows drivers to refuse the breath test, but they could lose their licenses for a year if they do.
The ruling came after a Seattle Municipal Court judge refused to allow the results of a blood test from Robert St. John, who refused a breath test after being hurt in a motorcycle crash in July 2005. Seattle obtained a warrant for a blood test. A Superior Court judge reversed the lower court's decision, and St. John appealed.
Subscribe to Closing Arguments
Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.