Elizabeth Warmerdam / October 17, 2016
(CN) — Civil rights groups agreed to drop their challenge to Arizona’s controversial “papers please” provision of its immigration law in exchange for the state issuing informal guidelines on how officers should enforce the law. The informal opinion released by the state attorney general’s office includes cautions against racial profiling and reminds officers that they cannot
(CN) — Civil rights groups agreed to drop their challenge to Arizona’s controversial “papers please” provision of its immigration law in exchange for the state issuing informal guidelines on how officers should enforce the law. The informal opinion released by the state attorney general’s office includes cautions against racial profiling and reminds officers that they cannot
(CN) — Civil rights groups agreed to drop their challenge to Arizona’s controversial “papers please” provision of its immigration law in exchange for the state issuing informal guidelines on how officers should enforce the law. The informal opinion released by the state attorney general’s office includes cautions against racial profiling and reminds officers that they cannot
(CN) — Civil rights groups agreed to drop their challenge to Arizona’s controversial “papers please” provision of its immigration law in exchange for the state issuing informal guidelines on how officers should enforce the law. The informal opinion released by the state attorney general’s office includes cautions against racial profiling and reminds officers that they cannot
(CN) — Civil rights groups agreed to drop their challenge to Arizona’s controversial “papers please” provision of its immigration law in exchange for the state issuing informal guidelines on how officers should enforce the law. The informal opinion released by the state attorney general’s office includes cautions against racial profiling and reminds officers that they cannot