Madison Venza / August 6, 2012
AUSTIN (CN) – A controversial autism researcher cannot sue “The British Medical Journal” for defamation in Texas, a Travis County judge ruled. Travis County Judge Amy Clark Meachum on Friday threw out Andrew Wakefield’s case for lack of jurisdiction. Wakefield made headlines by claiming in a scientific paper in 1998 that the widely used measles-mumps-and-rubella (MMR)
AUSTIN (CN) – A controversial autism researcher cannot sue “The British Medical Journal” for defamation in Texas, a Travis County judge ruled. Travis County Judge Amy Clark Meachum on Friday threw out Andrew Wakefield’s case for lack of jurisdiction. Wakefield made headlines by claiming in a scientific paper in 1998 that the widely used measles-mumps-and-rubella (MMR)
AUSTIN (CN) – A controversial autism researcher cannot sue “The British Medical Journal” for defamation in Texas, a Travis County judge ruled. Travis County Judge Amy Clark Meachum on Friday threw out Andrew Wakefield’s case for lack of jurisdiction. Wakefield made headlines by claiming in a scientific paper in 1998 that the widely used measles-mumps-and-rubella (MMR)
AUSTIN (CN) – A controversial autism researcher cannot sue “The British Medical Journal” for defamation in Texas, a Travis County judge ruled. Travis County Judge Amy Clark Meachum on Friday threw out Andrew Wakefield’s case for lack of jurisdiction. Wakefield made headlines by claiming in a scientific paper in 1998 that the widely used measles-mumps-and-rubella (MMR)
AUSTIN (CN) – A controversial autism researcher cannot sue “The British Medical Journal” for defamation in Texas, a Travis County judge ruled. Travis County Judge Amy Clark Meachum on Friday threw out Andrew Wakefield’s case for lack of jurisdiction. Wakefield made headlines by claiming in a scientific paper in 1998 that the widely used measles-mumps-and-rubella (MMR)