Judge declares mistrial for Palisades Fire arson suspect
Only two Los Angeles jurors believed former Uber driver Jonathan Rinderknecht was guilty of arson-related charges that could have landed him 45 years in prison.
TEXARKANA, Texas — An appeals court in Texas upheld a criminal defendant’s conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child, finding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in proceeding with the trial even though defendant could not be there for the first day because he was in the hospital after attempting suicide. There was sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s finding that he waived his Sixth Amendment right to be present at trial by voluntarily absenting himself from the proceedings.
Only two Los Angeles jurors believed former Uber driver Jonathan Rinderknecht was guilty of arson-related charges that could have landed him 45 years in prison.
The judge began the reading of the verdict with the names of those killed: A 9-year-old boy and five women aged between 45 and 75.
On Saturday, a judge who has led a two-year-long investigation ordered a jury trial for Sanchez's wife over alleged influence peddling and confiscated her passport.
The prosecution argued in closing that Jonathan Rinderknecht destroyed the lives of thousands of people because he felt rejected and ignored on New Year's Eve.
A retired LA Sheriff's Department investigator told the jury the prosecution's theory that the suspect was motivated by a desire to take revenge on society was based on outdated and vague models that would fit many people.
A London damages trial opened Monday with competing accounts of whether Google’s post-2017 changes restored competition or preserved its dominance.
The tragic case that first captured the nation's attention over 45 years ago was thrust back into the spotlight as Pedro Hernandez argued the jury was improperly instructed.