WASHINGTON (AP) — Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is appearing before Congress again to face questions about his company’s massive market power, privacy lapses, and tolerance of false and hateful speech.
Zuckerberg has been summoned to testify at a Wednesday hearing of the House Financial Services Committee on Facebook’s plan to create a global digital currency, which has stirred opposition from lawmakers and regulators in the United States and Europe. But the full range of policies and conduct of the social media giant with nearly 2.5 billion users will be under the public glare. It’s Zuckerberg’s first testimony to Congress since April 2018.
The company seems to spark public and official anger at every turn these days, from its shift into messaging services that allow encrypted conversations, to its alleged anticompetitive behavior, to its refusal to take down phony political ads and doctored videos.
Lawmakers from both parties and top regulators — including Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell — have criticized Facebook’s plan for the new currency, to be called Libra. They say it could be used for money laundering or drug trafficking.
Rep. Maxine Waters, the California Democrat who heads the Financial Services panel, this summer asked Facebook to not move forward with the currency and a digital wallet called Calibra that would be used with it. Waters called Libra “a new Swiss-based financial system” that potentially is too big to fail and could require a taxpayer bailout.
Several high-profile companies that had signed on as partners in Facebook’s governing association for Libra have bailed, spelling a potentially rough road for the project. But many experts do not believe it’s doomed.
Zuckerberg, in written testimony for the hearing, sought to reassure lawmakers that his company won’t try to evade financial regulators with Libra.
Facebook “will not be a part of launching the Libra payments system anywhere in the world unless all U.S. regulators approve it,” he said.
That’s a stronger statement than Facebook official David Marcus made to Congress in July, when he said the company would not activate Libra until it has “fully addressed regulatory concerns and received appropriate approvals.” Marcus leads the Libra project.
Zuckerberg is striving to defend Libra and alleviate concerns that the currency could duck regulators. Analysts say Libra could avoid regulation and launch in countries where it’s not getting pushback, but this does not appear to be Facebook’s intention.
Zuckerberg is pushing an optimistic vision of Libra and what it could mean for people around the world who don’t have access to bank accounts.
While some critics see the recent exodus of some Libra partners as evidence of the plan’s likely failure, U.S. regulators appear to view it as enough of a threat that they are considering the possibility of the Fed launching its own competing cybercurrency.
“At the Federal Reserve, we will continue to analyze the potential benefits and costs of central bank digital currencies, and look forward to learning from other central banks,” Lael Brainard, a member of the Fed’s board of governors, said in a speech last week.
There is concern among regulators that the massive reserve created with money used to buy the new currency could supplant the Fed and destabilize the financial system, and that consumers could be hurt by Libra losses.
Zuckerberg also played the China card in his remarks, urging regulators to act quickly. “While we debate these issues, the rest of the world isn’t waiting. China is moving quickly to launch similar ideas in the coming months,” he said.
The Facebook CEO has cited competition from China as a compelling reason against breaking up his company.
The Justice Department, the Federal Trade Commission and the House Judiciary antitrust subcommittee are all conducting investigations of Facebook and the other huge tech companies amid accusations of abuse of their market power to crush competition.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a leading Democratic presidential candidate, has advocated breaking up Facebook and other tech behemoths. She recently ran a fake political ad on Facebook taking aim at Zuckerberg to protest the company’s policy of not fact-checking politicians’ speech or ads in the same way it enlists outside parties to fact-check news stories and other posts.
In a speech last week at Georgetown University, Zuckerberg defended the company’s refusal to take down content from its platform it considers newsworthy “even if it goes against our standards.”
Facebook, Google and Twitter are trying to oversee internet content while avoiding infringing on First Amendment rights. The pendulum has swung recently toward restricting hateful speech that could spawn violence.