Witnesses Must Produce |Child Sex Abuse Docs

     SAN DIEGO (CN) — The national Jehovah’s Witnesses organization must produce any documents in its possession relating to perpetrators of child sexual abuse, a California appeals court ruled.
     Jose Lopez sued Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York and the Linda Vista Spanish Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses in June of 2012 for the sexual abuse he allegedly suffered when he was seven years old at the hands of his Bible instructor Gonzales Campos.
     In 1986, Lopez’s mother allowed Campos to give her son bible study lessons after an elder from her congregation recommended him because he was “good very good with children.”
     According to the complaint, after Campos had given Lopez several lessons, he sexually molested him.
     The abuse was reported to an elder of the church after Lopez told his mother, but nothing was done after the elders spoke to Lopez about where he was touched.
     This was not the first time there had been allegations Campos had sexually abused young boys.
     Another boy from the same congregation accused Campos of sexually molesting him four years earlier.
     Campos admitted to acting inappropriately, but the elders continued to allow him to be around children, and even continued to recommend him as a Bible instructor.
     Lopez and his mother left the congregation shortly after the alleged abuse, but Campos continued to rise within the congregation over the next several years, eventually serving as an elder and being placed on the congregation’s governing service committee.
     Yet, according to the Lopez’s complaint, between 1982 and 1995, Campos sexually abused at least eight other children.
     Neither Watchtower nor the congregation ever reported the incidents to law enforcement officers, the complaint said.
     With more than 1.2 million members and 13,777 congregations across the United States, the Jehovah’s Witness religion’s practices, policies and administrative duties were supervised by Watchtower during the relevant time period, including congregation elders who served as its agents.
     Watchtower challenged two discovery orders one requesting the church produce documents concerning the sexual abuse of other victims; the other seeking to compel the disposition of an individual believed to be the managing agent of Watchtower at the time.
     The organization also requested that an order, compelling it to pay nearly $38,000 in monetary sanctions, be terminated.
     In addition to rejecting claims the document request was overly broad and violated attorney-client privilege, a three-judge panel with California’s Fourth Appellate District also found that, although unusual, the 27-year post-incident request “is partly a function of the permissive limitations statutes governing child sexual abuse under which Lopez was seeking to recover for an alleged wrongful act committed almost three decades earlier.”
     Watchtower’s claim that the document request was overly oppressive because it would take years to comply was also rejected by the panel, which pointed out the church’s computer system had a search function that could easily identify information within the scanned documents.
     The panel also shot down Watchtower’s First Amendment objection by citing relevant cases, including a decade old case in which the court held it did not violate constitutional religious freedom when an archdiocese was order to product documents about priests who were indicted for sexually abusing children.
     While the three-judge panel upheld the discovery order, it found the disposition order was not supportable because there was no evidence that the named individual was a managing agent at the time Lopez was abused.
     Judge Judith Haller, writing for panel, concluded the ruling by finding the sanctions order needed to be vacated. “There was no question Watchtower willfully failed to comply with the document production order.” Judge Haller wrote. “The fundamental flaw with the court’s approach is there is no basis in the record showing the court could not have obtained Watchtowers’ compliance with lesser sanctions.”

%d bloggers like this: