Wild Horses

A federal court in Oregon ruled in favor of an animal advocacy group, finding that the Environmental Protection Agency’s decision not to initiate a special review of its use of the drug ZonaStat-H to control the fertility of wild horses was “arbitrary and capricious.”

PORTLAND, Ore. — A federal court in Oregon ruled in favor of an animal advocacy group, finding that the Environmental Protection Agency’s decision not to initiate a special review of its use of the drug ZonaStat-H to control the fertility of wild horses was “arbitrary and capricious.”

Categories / Law

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Wild Horses

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Additional Reads