Wal-Mart Not Liable for Shoe-Throwing Cashier

(CN) - Wal-Mart is not responsible for the actions of a bored cashier who started throwing items at a customer, including a bag containing shoes and shampoo, a New York appeals court ruled.

Michael Burlarley and his wife were checking out from the Kingston Wal-Mart when the cashier starting ringing up the items at outrageously high prices as a joke. The cashier also threw items at Burlarley. He was not amused and told her to stop.

She did at first, but then she threw a bag containing shoes and shampoo, hitting Burlarley in the face.

He sued Wal-Mart, which moved to dismiss the complaint because the cashier was not "acting within the scope of her employment."

The trial court ruled for Wal-Mart, and so did the Albany-based 3rd Appellate Division.

"In our view, (the lower) court properly concluded that throwing a full bag of heavy items at an unsuspecting customer's face as a 'joke' is not commonly done by a cashier, and indeed, substantially departs from a cashier's normal methods of performance," Justice Thomas Mercure wrote.

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Email *

Submit