Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Thursday, March 28, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Wal-Mart Class Action|Headed to Supreme Court

(CN) - The Supreme Court on Monday said it would review the employment discrimination class action against Wal-Mart, which threatens to cost the world's largest private employer billions in damages.

The 9th Circuit ruled 6-5 in April to send the case to trial, but the high court took up one of Wal-Mart's arguments for an appeal: whether a class action is an appropriate forum for individual employees' claims.

Six women sued the Bentonville, Ark.-based company in San Francisco Federal Court in 2001, claiming they received less pay and fewer promotions than men in comparable positions.

A federal judge ruled that the class should encompass "all women employed by Wal-Mart at any time after Dec. 26, 1998," across the company's 3,400 stores.

Wal-Mart argued that the proposed class - an estimated 1.5 million women - is too big to fight, and that employees should file individual lawsuits.

One circuit judge who affirmed the case wrote in April that "mere size does not render a case unmanageable."

In a dissenting opinion from the April decision, Judge Sandra Ikuta wrote: "No court has ever certified a class like this one, until now. And with good reason. In this case, six women who have worked in thirteen of Wal-Mart's 3,400 stores seek to represent every woman who has worked in those stores over the course of the last decade - a class estimated in 2001 to include more than 1.5 million women."

Categories / Uncategorized

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...