WASHINGTON (AP) — When the grand vacation homes of Newport Beach were empty on a beautiful Memorial Day weekend, Molly Munger decided it was time for the United States to consider taxing wealth.
As her family's boat moved through the harbor a few years ago, Munger, whose father is a billionaire investor, saw that many of her neighbors’ houses were sitting dark and vacant. She knew why: The owners had enough money to holiday at one of their several other luxury homes.
That didn't sit right, she said.
"It's just too much to watch that happen at the top and see what is happening at the bottom," said Munger, 71, a California civil rights attorney whose father, Charlie, built his fortune as vice chairman of Warren Buffett's firm Berkshire Hathaway. "Isn't it a waste when beautiful homes on the beach are empty for most of the summer?"
Munger is among a handful of billionaires and multimillionaires making a renewed push for the government to raise their taxes. As Democratic presidential candidates debate a tax on wealth rather than on incomes, this group of uber-rich people is urging them on.
"I believe in free markets. I'm the daughter of a capitalist. But not Darwin-like free, unregulated and red in tooth and claw," Munger said, quoting Alfred, Lord Tennyson’s poem “In Memoriam.”
The chief argument from these tycoons, financiers and scions is that the government could spend their money more effectively than they could on their own by improving schools, upgrading infrastructure and protecting the environment.
It challenges a longstanding belief among many politicians and economists that lower taxes on corporations and investment incomes are the most efficient way to deliver growth and spread wealth down the income ladder.
The idea is a direct challenge to the reputed billionaire in the White House, Donald Trump, who once backed a wealth tax but in 2017 enacted a dramatic tax cut that favored the rich.
Twenty people, including one who remained anonymous, signed a letter this summer essentially asking to be taxed more. The group included financier George Soros, Facebook cofounder Chris Hughes and heiress Abigail Disney, and others often involved in liberal causes. Bill Gates, the world's second-richest person, didn't sign it but has since said he "wouldn't be against a wealth tax" on a net worth that exceeds $100 billion.
While Democrats have long pushed for higher taxes on the top income tiers, the current debate goes further — whether to impose annual taxes on what people own, not just on what they earn.
Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren has endorsed a wealth tax on holdings above $50 million that could raise as much as $2.75 trillion over 10 years. Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders’ tax would start at $32 million. At last week's presidential debate, South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg, Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar and former Texas Rep. Beto O'Rourke expressed openness to levying a wealth tax, and Tom Steyer argued for higher taxes on his own $1.6 billion fortune.
There were some detractors: Tech entrepreneur Andrew Yang says wealth taxes in other nations have failed to raise enough revenues.
Former Vice President Joe Biden criticized the Warren and Sanders plans as "demonizing wealth" and argued instead for focusing on income taxes and raising the rates charged on earnings from investments.
Biden's view is backed by many in the economic establishment, even those who say they support using the tax code to counter income inequality.