Uber v. Google

Finding that compiled due-diligence documents were not protected by attorney-client privilege, a California appeals court <strong><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Uber-appeal.pdf">reversed</strong></a> a ruling allowing Uber to withhold them from discovery in a <a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/waymo-uber-showdown-ends-in-surprise-mid-trial-settlement/"><strong>lawsuit</strong></a> accusing the ride-sharing company of stealing Google's technology.

SAN FRANCISCO — Finding that compiled due-diligence documents were not protected by attorney-client privilege, a California appeals court on Friday reversed a ruling allowing Uber to withhold them from discovery in a lawsuit accusing the ride-sharing company of stealing Google’s technology.

Categories / Appeals, Business, Law, Technology

Subscribe to our free newsletters

Our weekly newsletter Closing Arguments offers the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world, while the monthly Under the Lights dishes the legal dirt from Hollywood, sports, Big Tech and the arts.