CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas (CN) – Texas is sticking to its guns, arguing its voter ID law was passed to prevent voter fraud, ahead of a hearing on whether the law was crafted to disenfranchise minorities.
Passed by the Republican-controlled Texas Legislature, Senate Bill 14 has been tied up by federal rules or in federal court since former Texas Gov. Rick Perry signed it in May 2011.
U.S. District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos will hear arguments next month or early next year from attorneys representing the Texas State Conference of NAACP Branches, League of United Latin American Citizens and African-American U.S. Rep. Marc Veasey, D-Fort Worth, among other plaintiffs who challenged the law in June 2013.
The U.S. Justice Department is also a plaintiff in the case, but experts say it may drop out when President-elect Donald Trump takes office in January because Trump’s pick for attorney general, Republican Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, supports photo ID laws.
After a nine-day bench trial in 2014, Ramos found SB 14 is discriminatory in violation of the Voting Rights Act because poor Texans are less likely to have one of seven acceptable forms of SB 14 photo ID, and blacks and Hispanics are more likely to be living in poverty.
Around 608,000 registered voters in Texas do not have proper SB 14 ID, which represents 4.5 percent of all registered voters in Texas, according to the case record.
Ramos issued an injunction ordering Texas to revert back to the voting rules in place before SB 14 took effect that let registered voters establish their identities with voter-registration cards that listed their name, gender and birth year.
Texas appealed to the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans and the en banc court agreed with Ramos in July of this year that SB 14 has a discriminatory effect on minorities, who typically vote for Democratic candidates.
Ramos approved an interim plan for the Nov. 8 election under which Texans could present a certified birth certificate, utility bill or paycheck at the polls and sign an affidavit stating why they could not get SB 14 ID.
The Fifth Circuit also ordered Ramos to hold a hearing after Election Day on whether Texas intentionally crafted SB 14 to disenfranchise minority voters.
Texas has argued from the start that SB 14 is needed to prevent voter fraud and ensure voter confidence in elections.
It repeated that claim in a proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law brief that it filed Nov. 18. Such briefs outline arguments a party must prove to prevail in a bench trial, and are comparable to a jury charge.
Texas was just one of many states to push for voter ID laws in response to the 2000 U.S. presidential election. Though Democratic candidate Al Gore won the popular vote that year, issues with ballots in Florida led the U.S. Supreme Court to award his opponent George W. Bush the presidency, Angela Colmenero, chief counsel with the Texas Attorney General’s Office, wrote in the brief.
“The push for a photo-voter ID law, which began following the 2000 election, was hitting its peak in 2011. By then, nearly 1,000 voter ID bills had been introduced across the country and numerous legislatures had passed such laws,” Texas’ brief states.