(CN) - A federal judge has vacated a $325,000 award to a student who took issue with her high school history teacher's unorthodox methods, which included showing gruesome photos of women murdered by Charles Manson.
M. Young, as she is identified in court records, sued the Pleasant Valley School District and her former teacher Bruce Smith Jr. in 2007, claiming that she suffered retaliation after complaining Smith "showed photographs of naked murdered and dismembered females during his history class, as well as asked female students about what they were wearing during a pillow fight (i.e. panties), discussed push-up bras, and that he skipped college classes to 'bang the cheerleader.'"
The Brodheadsville, Pa.-based district ultimately suspended the popular history teacher without pay and "unleashed a series of truly unfortunate and troubling consequences that derailed [the student's] previously happy and successful high school career," according to a summary of the case by Chief U.S. District Judge Yvette Kane.
The highly publicized litigation brought "notoriety" and an "angry backlash" to Young "so profoundly, that she left her junior year of high school and the extracurricular activities she once enjoyed in favor of home schooling for the remainder of the school year," according to the court.
When the case went to trial in August 2011, a jury ordered the district to pay Young $200,000, and ordered Smith to pay his former student $125,000.
Smith and the district in turn moved for a new trial and judgment as a matter of law.
Kane set the verdict aside and ordered a new trial last week, despite noting that the parties have endured "five years of lengthy discovery and the most contentious, voluminous, and vitriolic motions practice ever seen by this court."
"Though the parties' submissions contain an extraordinary amount of personal sniping that exceeds even the most spirited style of advocacy, when the rhetoric is separated from the legal challenges to the jury's verdict as outlined by defendant ... the unavoidable conclusion is that the law dictates that this verdict be set aside," Kane wrote.
Young had claimed that Smith targeted her by showing of a "whistle-blower" film on the Pentagon Papers, and that the district failed to properly support her or protect her from classmate harassment while other students held a pro-Smith rally on the school campus.
But Kane said that the district and Smith showed that Young's First Amendment retaliation claims were defective.
Finding that Young may have engaged in protected First Amendment conduct by complaining about a teacher, however, the court refused to grant the school district judgment as a matter of law.
Ultimately a new trial is warranted because the jury inconsistently found the district liable but let Principal John Gress off the hook, despite his role as "the only relevant policymaker," according to the 62-page decision.
Smith must still face individual liability on hostile school environment claims, Kane ruled, but she found that the evidence does not support the jury finding that he created a sexually hostile educational environment.
Several of Smith's questionable classroom materials can be said to have a pedagogical purpose, according to the court, which found that images of women murdered by Charles Manson, or of Nazi book burning, have historical value.