WASHINGTON (CN) - The U.S. Supreme Court rejected T-Mobile USA's appeal of a 9th Circuit decision allowing a California class action against the company to move forward, despite the arbitration clause in the telecommunication company's cell-phone contracts.
Consumers originally filed suit in Washington state court, alleging that T-Mobile breached its contracts and violated the state Consumer Protection Act by failing to disclose the terms of the contracts, including taxes on the free phones offered under T-Mobile plans.
The district court denied T-Mobile's motion to compel arbitration, and the 9th Circuit affirmed, finding the arbitration clause "unconscionable and unenforceable" under state law.
But T-Mobile's appeal to the high court was not welcomed by all in the telecommunications industry. AT&T Corp. filed an amicus brief encouraging the justices to let carriers work out the kinks in cell-phone arbitration clauses.
T-Mobile maintained that federal arbitration law barred the class action.
Subscribe to Closing Arguments
Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.