(CN) - The Supreme Court will decide whether people convicted of crimes but later exonerated can get a refund of their court fees and other costs stemming from their cases.
The case, Shannon Nelson v. Colorado, challenges a state requirement that criminal defendants prove by "clear and convincing evidence" that they are in fact innocent after a reversal of their conviction, before they can get their money back.
The petition for a writ of petition for a writ of certiorari questions whether this requirement violates the defendant's due process rights.
The lead plaintiff in the case, Shannon Nelson, was assessed $8,192 in processing charges and restitution costs after being convicted on sexual assault charges; a second plaintiff, Louis Alonzo Madden, was assessed $4,413 in court costs and restitution on similar charges.
Both ultimately had their convictions thrown out on appeal, but a trial court declined to reimburse the money.
A Colorado appeals court said state law required a full refund.
But the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that costs could be returned only if they proved their innocence by clear and convincing evidence.
Subscribe to Closing Arguments
Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.