SAN FRANCISCO (CN) - An "artist's sale of his original work constitutes speech protected by the First Amendment," the Ninth Circuit ruled.
Itinerant artist Steven C. White filed a lawsuit against the city of Sparks, Nev., for prohibiting him from selling his paintings in Victorian Square without city approval. City officials refused to approve White's work because it did not "patently express a religious, ideological, political or philosophical message." White claimed his paintings of nature scenes convey the message that humans are driving animals into extinction. The circuit held that White may sell his paintings because they "communicate his vision of the sanctity of nature" and are not purely commercial speech. See ruling in .
Categories / Uncategorized
Subscribe to Closing Arguments
Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.