Railroads

In a case stemming from a 19th-century practice known as a “shop agreement,” a federal court in Texas ruled in favor of Union Pacific Railroad, voiding an agreement that the railroad must employ a certain percentage of its office and shop employees in Palestine, Texas.

TYLER, Texas — In a case stemming from a 19th-century practice known as a “shop agreement,” a federal court in Texas ruled in favor of Union Pacific Railroad, voiding an agreement that the railroad must employ a certain percentage of its office and shop employees in Palestine, Texas.

Categories / Business, Employment

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Railroads

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Additional Reads