Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Wednesday, April 23, 2025

View Back issues

Pipeline Construction

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Although Kinder Morgan violated the conditions of a biological opinion and incidental take statement designed to protect a federally protected bird species during its construction of a natural gas pipeline in the Texas Hill Country, a federal court in the state <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/pipelineconstruction.pdf"><strong>ruled</strong></a>, plaintiffs seeking to prohibit the company from engaging in clearing and construction are still not entitled to a preliminary injunction. </span>

AUSTIN, Texas – Although Kinder Morgan violated the conditions of a biological opinion and incidental take statement designed to protect a federally protected bird species during its construction of a natural gas pipeline in the Texas Hill Country, a federal court in the state ruled , plaintiffs seeking to prohibit the company from engaging in clearing and construction are still not entitled to a preliminary injunction.

Kinder Morgan cleared “potential warbler habitat in all but three areas of the pipeline’s route” before the preliminary injunction hearing and these “past harms cannot be prevented by a preliminary injunction,” the court determined.

Categories / Business, Energy, Environment

Subscribe to our free newsletters

Our weekly newsletter Closing Arguments offers the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world, while the monthly Under the Lights dishes the legal dirt from Hollywood, sports, Big Tech and the arts.

Loading...