Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Tuesday, May 21, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Petition Sketches Out City Liability for Fatal Bronx Fire

Families affected by a Bronx inferno that killed 13 people just before the new year initiated legal proceedings Friday against the city, citing reports of building code violations, inoperable fire hydrants and destruction of evidence.

BRONX, N.Y. (CN) – After a massive fire killed 13 in the Bronx last month, survivors and relatives of some of the victims set the stage in court Friday for what could be a $200 million lawsuit against New York City.

One of the worst to hit New York City in decades, the fire at 2363 Prospect Avenue was started at around 6:15 p.m. on Dec. 28 by a 3-year-old boy, playing with the burners on a gas stove.

The boy and his mother fled as flames engulfed the kitchen of the family’s first-floor apartment, but they failed to close the door, causing the blaze to spread much more rapidly through the building.

Andrene Paul, who lost a sister in the fire and three nieces, ages 2, 7 and 19, is the lead claimant in Friday’s petition, which was filed in Bronx County Supreme Court by the law firm Ronemus & Vilensky.

“This is a pre-emptive strike” to preserve documents and evidence in the case, attorney Robert Vilensky said, noting in an interview Monday that an eventual lawsuit may seek damages of upwards of $200 million for deaths, property damage, and pain and suffering.

Seeking an order of evidence preservation, the petition notes that the city unsealed the apartment where the fire started so that a representative of General Electric could examine and take the stove, potentially tainting evidence from the scene.

Vilensky said he learned just this past weekend from the building landlord that an insurance company has taken possession of the stove, as well as other evidence.

The 17-page petition sketches out several theories of liability the plaintiffs may pursue, citing numerous problems and violations with the five-story building, including a lack of working smoke detectors, as well as a failure by the city to inspect for emergency lighting and exit signs, among other features.

Firefighters also lost “precious time,” according to the petition, in trying to locate operable fire hydrants when the ones nearest to the fire were frozen.

As for the unnamed child believed to have started the fire, the petition says Fire Commissioner Daniel Nigro indicated that this wasn’t the first time the boy had played with the stove.

“Upon information and belief, the mother of said child was a person known to the authorities and to the Administration for Child Services Department for not watching and care of her child,” the petition states. “The claimants contend that had said Administration for Child Services Department and/or other city agencies followed up on complaints and taken the child away from the mother, as they should have, said fire would not have occurred.”

In the initial days after the fire, attorney Vilensky told the New York Daily News that social workers “were well aware that the mother might not have been the greatest mother in terms of watching that child.”

Eric Ferrero with the Administration for Child Services called the claim “completely baseless.”

“ACS has no prior involvement with this mother and this child,” Ferrero said in an email.

A spokesman for the city declined to comment on the petition.

Along with stories of tragedy, the fire had its share of heroes, including U.S. Army Private Emmanuel Mensah. A native of Ghana, Mensah perished after racing into the building for the third time to help fellow residents escape. The city plans to name a street after him.

Excluding the fall of the Twin Towers on 9/11, last month’s fire was the worst in city history since the 1990 inferno at the Happy Land social club, which killed 87 people, also in the Bronx. StreetEasy.com describes the 26-unit building on Prospect Avenue as built in 1916.

Noting that the cause of the fire has still not been officially confirmed, the petition seeks to quickly preserve evidence in the case, including building debris from the fire, gas lines, the stove, and official documents.

“Outside of the facts herein based largely upon news reports, nothing else is clear or certain,” the petition states. “Therefore, petitioners cannot be sure as to exactly what causes of action are available to them, nor are they aware of all the proper parties to any potential lawsuit.”

The petition states later: “It is incumbent on the petitioners to request that their experts examine the physical evidence maintained by the defendants herein before it is ‘accidentally’ disposed of.”

Attorney Vilensky noted that his clients have conducted their own investigation of the fire, taking photos and videos of the charred building.

“Still, there are things the city did that they shouldn’t have done,” he said, such as hiring a carting company to keep some of the debris, including the door to the apartment where the fire started.

Follow @NickRummell
Categories / Government, Health, Personal Injury, Regional

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.