(CN) - The New Jersey Supreme Court upheld the state's campaign-finance laws, dismissing a contractor's claim that it was improperly denied a work contract based on a prior political contribution.
Earle Asphalt Co. was the low bidder on a contract to pave Interstate 195, but the U.S. Department of Treasury disqualified the company due to a contribution to the Monmouth Country Republican Committee of more than $1,500. The limit is $300.
Earle challenged the constitutionality of the Campaign Contributions and Expenditure Reporting Act, claiming that it violates free-speech rights.
The court unanimously ruled that the spending limit was necessary to avoid "the risk of improper influence, purchase of access, or the appearance thereof."
Although Earle requested a refund within 30 days of the contribution, the company did not receive the refund until 41 days had elapsed, the justices concluded.
Subscribe to Closing Arguments
Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.