WASHINGTON (CN) – What he heard firsthand on the call between President Donald Trump and Ukraine President Volodoymr Zelensky so alarmed Army Lieutenant Colonel Alex Vindman, he went straight to his superiors on the National Security Council to report it.
“As an active duty military officer, the command structure is extremely important to me,” Vindman, a Purple Heart recipient, will say Tuesday, reading a prepared statement during closed-door deposition with House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs and Oversight Committee lawmakers conducting the Trump impeachment inquiry.
It was a “sense of duty and obligation” that Vindman says spurred him to red-flag the July 25 Trump-Zelensky call to NSC’s top attorney, John Eisenberg.
“I was concerned by the call. I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’s support of Ukraine,” Vindman will say Tuesday. “I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma, it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained.”
Vindman’s remarks refer to former Vice President Joe Biden, Biden’s son Hunter, and Burisma Holdings, the Ukrainian energy company that once counted Hunter as a board member.
According to his opening remarks, Vindman’s report to Eisenberg following the call was in fact the second time the lieutenant colonel sought Eisenberg out.
On July 10, after the secretary of national security and defense council for Ukraine, Oleksandr Danylyuk, met with then national security adviser John Bolton, Energy Secretary Rick Perry and U.S. ambassadors Kurt Volker and Gordon Sondland, things were going very smoothly – until they weren’t.
Ambassador Sondland shifted the discussion to Ukraine “delivering specific investigations in order to secure the meeting with the president,” Vindman will testify.
A reportedly fuming Bolton abruptly ended the meeting at that point. In the moments after, Vindman testifies he warned Sondland directly that his statements were “inappropriate” and that the request for Ukraine to deliver investigations into the 2016 election, the Bidens and Burisma were not matters of national security.
Fiona Hill, Trump’s former adviser on Russia and Europe, then entered the room.
According to Vindman’s opening statement, Hill also told Sondland his statements were out of line.
While Vindman’s testimony corroborates the account of events to which Hill testified earlier this month, it also casts a massive shadow of doubt over Sondland.
Sondland told lawmakers on Oct. 17 that no one, including Bolton and Hill, “harbored any misgivings about the propriety of what we were doing.”