(CN) - A new executive order signed Sunday night by President Donald Trump adds North Korea and Venezuela to the list of Muslim-majority countries whose citizens face restricted entry to the United States.
Set to take effect Oct. 18, this third iteration of the travel ban indefinitely bans U.S. travel by citizens of Syria, Yemen, Chad, Somalia, Libya, Iran and North Korea. It also incorporates specific restrictions on travelers from Iraq and Venezuela.
“Making America Safe is my number one priority,” Trump tweeted Sunday. “We will not admit those into our country we cannot safely vet.”
Trump signed the first travel ban in January, just a week after is inauguration, unleashing chaos at the nation’s airports and sparking a flurry of legal challenges. Though the White House characterized the ban as necessary for national security, a federal judge who enjoined it found that the president’s anti-Islamic rhetoric on the campaign trail betrayed the ban’s discriminatory intent.
Trump’s addition of North Korea and Venezuela to the latest ban appears to be an effort to circumvent those legal challenges.
The executive order further details what administration officials are touting as a rigorous months-long analysis that explored the security measures and immigration vetting apparatus of more than 200 countries, concluding that the countries on the list were deficient in those areas.
“The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, has determined that a small number of countries — out of nearly 200 evaluated — remain deficient at this time with respect to their identity-management and information-sharing capabilities, protocols, and practices,” Trump says in the executive order. “In some cases, these countries also have a significant terrorist presence within their territory.”
Legal experts say this analysis process, coupled with the fact that not all countries are Muslim-majority, may make this version of the travel ban more resilient to legal challenges.
As with the January travel ban, the second version published in March, faced a federal court injunction that was later affirmed by the Ninth Circuit.
The U.S. Supreme Court granted a stay that some aspects of the ban take effect, however, refusing U.S. entry to nationals from the six proscribed nations unless they can demonstrate a “bona fide relationship” to the United States.
A new spate of legal challenges ensued, attempting to clearly define that term. Oral arguments were set to proceed before the high court on Oct. 10, but on Monday the court canceled the hearing and ordered all parties to file briefs as to whether Trump's new order renders the case moot.