Montana Ethics

The Montana Supreme Court ruled that the state's political practices agency was justified in dismissing an ethics complaint that claimed the agency's deputy made statements to a radio station that constituted election advocacy. The high court found that the statements could reasonably be interpreted as a defense of a state statute.

HELENA, Mont. — The Montana Supreme Court ruled that the state's political practices agency was justified in dismissing an ethics complaint that claimed the agency's deputy made statements to a radio station that constituted election advocacy. The high court found that the statements could reasonably be interpreted as a defense of a state statute.

Categories / Appeals, Government, Media, Politics

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Montana Ethics

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Additional Reads