Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Tuesday, June 25, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Model-Train Outfit Calls MTA a Bully

A model-train company chugged its way into the Fourth Circuit to defend its business against trademark claims by New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

RICHMOND, Va. (CN) — A model-train company chugged its way into the Fourth Circuit to defend its business against trademark claims by New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

Based in Columbia, Md., Mike’s Train House has for over 35 years manufactured and sold model trains and subway cars throughout the United States. Train enthusiasts have looked its way for over a decade, according to the complaint, for replications of the cars that run in New York, which has the largest public-transit system in the country.

Though the MTA first sent Mike’s a cease-and-desist letter in 2006, alleging trademark and trade dress violations, Mike’s says the agency never pursued its claims.

That changed this year, however, when New York approved $27 billion dollars in funding for MTA to overhaul its aging system.

With the MTA threatening to sue over the issues it dropped a decade earlier, Mike’s complied with the cease-and-desist letter and filed suit in Maryland.

A federal judge dismissed the complaint last month, however, prompting Mike’s to file an appeal last week with the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Va.

Mike’s says the threatened litigation is barred by the fair-use doctrine and the First Amendment, but U.S. District Judge J. Frederick Motz found that the court lacked jurisdiction.

Neither the MTA, Mike’s Train House nor its attorney, John Dabney, have returned requests for comment.

Dabney is with the Washington law firm McDermott Will & Emery.

The complaint noted that the MTA had objected to Mike’s model subway entrance signs that said “Flushing-Main Street/Roosevelt Avenue” and “Vernon Boulevard/Jackson Avenue.”

“MTA does not own valid copyrights to the street names,” the complaint states.

Categories / Appeals, Business, Regional

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...