Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Thursday, May 23, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Longer Sentence to Qualify for Rehab Was Improper

The 10th Circuit recently ruled that a federal judge improperly lengthened a woman's prison sentence by 40 percent so she would qualify for a prison rehabilitation program.

(CN) – The 10th Circuit recently ruled that a federal judge improperly lengthened a woman's prison sentence by 40 percent so she would qualify for a prison rehabilitation program.

Attorneys for Ashley Tidzump asked a federal judge in Wyoming to sentence her to 18 months for assault. The court said it preferred not to sentence her to prison time.

The judge then made an about-face, sentencing Tidzump to 31 months because it was likely the “shortest prison sentence” to allow her to enter into a residential drug-abuse treatment program. Tidzump had acknowledged an addition to opiates in court.

Tenth Circuit Judge Robert Bacharach wrote for a three-judge panel that had the trial court not focused on a rehabilitation program, Tidzump’s sentence would likely have been shorter.

When "the district court decided the sentence with a laudable purpose (facilitating rehabilitation) and proceeded without the benefit of adversarial argument," it set itself up for a clear Tapia violation, Bacharach wrote.

The 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Tapia v. United States held that federal judges cannot longer prison sentences for rehabilitation purposes.

Follow @jamierossCNS
Categories / Appeals

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...