Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Friday, April 19, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Judge Rejects Stone Claims of Mueller Press Leaks

A federal judge on Wednesday denied Roger Stone's request that Special Counsel Robert Mueller's office prove it did not violate a court order sealing the indictment against the longtime Republican operative and former Trump associate.

WASHINGTON (CN) - A federal judge on Wednesday denied Roger Stone's request that Special Counsel Robert Mueller's office prove it did not violate a court order sealing the indictment against the longtime Republican operative and former Trump associate.

Former campaign adviser for President Donald Trump, Roger Stone, leaves federal court Thursday, Feb. 21, 2019, in Washington. A judge has imposed a full gag order on Trump confidant Roger Stone after he posted a photo on Instagram of the judge with what appeared to be crosshairs of a gun. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

Stone had accused Mueller of violating a court order by releasing the indictment before Stone's early-morning arrest last month, tipping off media who were then able to capture the raid on his Florida home.

Mueller's office denied the charges, telling U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in court briefs that it published the indictment only after Stone was arrested.

In a four-page order issued Wednesday, Jackson said that based on Stone's own timeline of events, Mueller's office complied with a court order governing the public release of the indictment.

Stone was arrested at 6:06 a.m., which freed up the Special Counsel's Office to post the indictment on its public website. Ten minutes after Stone's arrest, a spokesperson for the Special Counsel's Office sent the indictment to reporters.

"The defendant misapprehends the clear purpose and the intent of the sealing order," Jackson wrote. "The OSC's publication of the indictment after the defendant's arrest was not unauthorized and the court concludes that no order to show cause is warranted in this case based on these facts."

Jackson's order also does away with Stone's claim that reporters were tipped off to his impending arrest ahead of time, noting a reporter did not contact Stone's attorneys until 6:11 that morning, five minutes after he had been arrested.

"In any event, defendant's recitation of the events reflects nothing more than the fact that the reporter had the indictment in hand after the defendant was arrested and there is no evidence that the reporter had it earlier," Jackson wrote.

Stone is accused of obstruction and lying to Congress about his work seeking information about hacked emails WikiLeaks published during the 2016 election that were damaging to President Donald Trump’s opponent Hillary Clinton. He has pleaded not guilty.

Categories / Criminal, Government, Media, Politics

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...