Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Wednesday, April 23, 2025

View Back issues

Interrogation ethics

WASHINGTON — The D.C. Court of Appeals revived three retired military psychologists’ defamation claims against the American Psychological Association and an attorney. The accused allegedly published a report stating the psychologists colluded with the Department of Defense to implement interrogation techniques unfettered by APA ethical guidelines.

Read the ruling [here.](https://webservices.courthousenews.com/sites/Data/AppellateOpinionUploads/2023-07-9--10-42-47-Banks et al. v. Hoffman et al. 20-CV-318.pdf)

Categories / Appeals, Briefs, Media

Subscribe to our free newsletters

Our weekly newsletter Closing Arguments offers the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world, while the monthly Under the Lights dishes the legal dirt from Hollywood, sports, Big Tech and the arts.

Loading...