Hotel Abuse

Affirming summary judgment in favor of a hotelier, a California appeals court ruled Tuesday that a hotel employee’s sexual acts with a teen was not foreseeable and therefore the hotelier had no duty to prevent the acts or protect the teen.

LOS ANGELES – Affirming summary judgment in favor of a hotelier, a California appeals court ruled Tuesday that a hotel employee’s sexual acts with a teen was not foreseeable and therefore the hotelier had no duty to prevent the acts or protect the teen.

Categories / Appeals, Business, Employment

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Hotel Abuse

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Additional Reads