SAN FRANCISCO – The en banc Ninth Circuit ruled Tuesday that – medical disability or not – chronic alcoholism is a constitutionally valid reason to classify an undocumented immigrant as a “habitual drunkard” lacking the good moral character necessary to avoid deportation.
The immigrant, Salomon Ledezma-Cosino aka Cocino Soloman Ledesma, is a construction worker who entered the United States from Mexico in 1997. After 10 years of alcohol abuse that included drinking an average of one liter of tequila a day, Ledezma-Cosino has acute alcoholic hepatitis and decompensated cirrhosis of the liver.
Tuesday’s en banc ruling reverses a 2-1 Ninth Circuit panel finding that “habitual drunkard” is not unconstitutionally vague.
Subscribe to Closing Arguments
Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.
Additional Reads
-
-
Weed Air April 22, 2024