Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Wednesday, April 24, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

German Court Backs Murderer’s ‘Right to Be Forgotten’

A man convicted of murder 37 years ago has the right to be forgotten and have his name removed from online search results, Germany's highest court ruled on Wednesday.

BERLIN, Germany (AFP) — A man convicted of murder 37 years ago has the right to be forgotten and have his name removed from online search results, Germany's highest court ruled on Wednesday.

The constitutional court in Karlsruhe found in favor of a man who was given a life sentence for killing two people on a yacht in 1982.

The man, who was released from prison in 2002, is now fighting to distance his family name from reports about the case.  

The decision could mean publications are forced to restrict search engine access to their online archives in such cases.

His full name still appears in online searches as part of an archived article in German weekly Der Spiegel.

His case was initially rejected by a federal court in 2012 on the basis that his right to privacy did not outweigh public interest and press freedom. 

But Germany's highest court has now thrown out that initial ruling, meaning his case will now return to the federal courts.

Yet the court also insisted that individuals could not unilaterally claim a right to be forgotten and that its decision had been influenced by the amount of time that had passed since the crime. 

The "right to be forgotten" has been the subject of a longstanding legal dispute involving Google and the EU.  

In 2014, a European Court of Justice ruling forced search engines to comply with requests to remove results. 

Google hit back last September when the same court ruled that the right to be forgotten only applied to search results in Europe. 

In a separate case, the German constitutional court ruled against a woman campaigning to have the transcript of a TV program from 2010 removed from searches of her name. 

In the TV show, the woman had been accused of treating employees unfairly. The court described her complaint as "unfounded".

© Agence France-Presse

Categories / Appeals, Civil Rights, Criminal, Technology

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...