(CN) - The controversial former chief lobbyist for the California courts has resurfaced in a new role as pitchman, sending out a mass email to every judge in California promoting a "remote appearance platform" that allows long-distance court testimony.
As one of the top officials in California's court bureaucracy, Curt Child was a principal promoter of the software platform called the Court Case Management System. The project was widely derided as a mismanaged fiasco before it was finally abandoned, after plowing through a half-billion dollars in public funds, most of it sent to a private contractor.
Child was also connected to a series of additional policies and incidents that often brought intense criticism from the Legislature and trial judges.
When Child left in March, the director of the court administrative office, Martin Hoshino, issued a press release saying he was leaving for an undisclosed "national firm that will continue to enable to him work with judges."
Those words were given substance by a mass email sent last month from Child to all the judges in California, pitching a technology platform that allows for video appearances in court hearings.
"This a new and exciting opportunity for me to work with a company that is committed to improving access to justice and improving efficiencies for the courts," said Child in his email, appropriating themes used to promote the old CCMS software.
Child's new employer is called CourtCall, which has been in the business of long-distance court appearances for 20 years.
It his message to all the judges, Child added, "I will be in touch."
Child did not respond to a request for comment. His email brought substantial comment, however, from the judges in the state, who questioned whether the powerful former administrator was cashing in on his old job.
Judge Runston Maino of San Diego fired off his own email to members of California's Judicial Council, the rule-making body led by Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye who appoints a majority of the council members.
"I have to wonder about how appropriate it was for Mr. Child to send this sort of an announcement out to every judge and justice in California? It is very difficult for me to believe that any of you would approve of such a thing," Maino wrote. "In any case I do hope that since Mr. Child has access to the email address of every judge and justice in California that he will not be giving or selling this information to anyone else. Despite our filters I get enough goofy materials on my public email address already. I certainly do not wish Mr. Child to add to the pile."
Speaking for the California Judges Association, Judge Joan Weber said the email from Child was not a matter for its board to consider.
"CJA has a hard-working ethics committee that deals with ethical issues related solely to judicial officers," said Weber, the CJA's president. "This issue, however, does not involves a judicial officer. It involves a former member of the Judicial Council staff. Therefore, the CJA would generally not be rendering an opinion on this type of issue."
For the Alliance of California Judges, Judge Maryanne Gilliard pressed the matter with the director of the court administrative office.