Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Tuesday, April 23, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Florist Flap

Answering a question from the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday, the Washington state Supreme Court said courts did not act with religious animus in determining a florist violated anti-discrimination laws by refusing to do the flowers for a gay couple’s wedding.

OLYMPIA, Wash. – Answering a question from the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday, the Washington state Supreme Court said courts did not act with religious animus in determining a florist violated anti-discrimination laws by refusing to do the flowers for a gay couple’s wedding.

Categories / Civil Rights, Courts, Religion

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...