Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Saturday, June 15, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Ex-Consultant Chided for Dodging Child Support

(CN) - A California appeals court admonished a former financial consultant for shirking his duty to support his family by deferring his $200,000 income. The court acknowledged that Marc Berger has the right to pursue happiness, but said he "certainly cannot do so by voluntarily deferring salary, living extravagantly off [his] sizeable assets, and pleading poverty at the support hearing."

The former partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers was earning $600,000 before he left his job in 2001 to launch a landscape financing business, X-Scapes.

He divorced his wife, Rachael, in 2004. The former couple has two daughters.

Though X-Scapes was reportedly in dire financial straits, Berger continued to live a wealthy lifestyle on the company's initial investments and his other assets. "By his own admission, Marc's expenses exceed $21,000 per month," the ruling states.

At trial, Berger admitted to having about $800,000 in cash, and said he took out a $1.8 million loan in early 2006 to build a house in Laguna Beach.

The trial court ordered him to "report on a quarterly basis ... the financial circumstances of X-Scapes, and any job searches undertaken," but stopped short of enforcing his $7,500 monthly support payments. The court found that Berger was earning only $2,000 a month at X-Scapes, because he had deferred the rest, and ordered him to pay $1,115 in child support and no spousal support.

The 4th District Court of Appeal said Berger can't justify reducing his monthly payments by deferring his $200,000 income and putting it back into the business.

"The fact he is choosing to plow that salary back into the company cannot be spun into a basis for ignoring those earnings," Justice Bedsworth wrote.

"Nobody forced Marc into this situation. Just as nobody forced him to spend nearly a million dollars on unimproved property in Laguna Beach," the appellate court added. "Marc has chosen to relinquish his current ability to collect [his X-Scapes] salary, and thus - he believes - the bulk of his obligation to support his family."

But Berger is not free to relinquish those obligations, the court concluded.

"Clearly, Marc has not viewed the deferral of his X-Scapes income as any justification for curtailing his own current lifestyle."

Categories / Uncategorized

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...