Rights Court Overturns Israeli Boycott Convictions in France

French demonstrators and supporters of Palestinians of the BDS movement hold a placard with the word “Boycott” during a 2012 demonstration in Paris. The European Court of Human Rights ruled Thursday that France violated the freedom of expression of pro-Palestinian activists who were convicted for campaigning against Israeli goods. (AP Photo/Jacques Brinon, File)

STRASBOURG, France (AFP) — Europe’s top rights court ruled Thursday that French judges were wrong to convict activists who staged a “boycott Israel” demonstration at a supermarket, saying the protest could not be considered an incitement to discrimination.

The European Court of Human Rights ordered French authorities to pay each of the applicants $8,413 in damages, and another $22,800 to jointly cover legal expenses. 

Eleven members of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement in France, known as Collectif Palestine 68, were charged after displaying Israeli-origin products and urging clients not to buy them at a store near Mulhouse, eastern France, on two occasions in 2009 and 2010.

The protests, which came a few months after a flare-up in fighting between Israeli forces and Hamas in Gaza, echoed longstanding calls by NGOs to denounce Israel’s policies, including its settlements in Palestinian territories.

The Israeli government has denounced the boycott movement as an attempt to undermine its legitimacy, and has banned entry to foreigners who support the calls.

Though the activists were initially cleared of charges after arguing it was a case of free speech, an appeals court overturned the ruling and found them guilty of inciting people to discriminate against products from Israel.

They were ordered to pay a joint fine of 1,000 euros ($1,140) to three civil parties, including the International League against Racism and Anti-Semitism.

But the Strasbourg-based ECHR said the French judges should have taken into account the fact that “the applicants had not been convicted of making racist or antisemitic remarks or of inciting hatred or violence.”

Political speech is by nature controversial, the court said in its ruling, but remains a legitimate public interest, “provided that it did not cross the line and turn into a call for violence, hatred or intolerance.”

Amnesty International, which in 2018 saw one of its U.S. employees denied access to the West Bank because of its support of the boycott, hailed the European court’s ruling.

“Today’s landmark decision sets a significant precedent that should stop the misuse of anti-discrimination laws to target activists campaigning against human rights violations perpetrated by Israel against Palestinians,” Marco Perolini of Amnesty France said in a statement. 

© Agence France-Presse

%d bloggers like this: